...
首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Research >Marine turtle nest depredation by feral pigs (Sus scrofa) on the Western Cape York Peninsula Australia: Implications for management
【24h】

Marine turtle nest depredation by feral pigs (Sus scrofa) on the Western Cape York Peninsula Australia: Implications for management

机译:澳大利亚西约克角半岛上野猪(Sus scrofa)对海龟巢的掠夺:对管理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context The west coast of the Cape York Peninsula (CYP) is a major nesting ground for three species of threatened marine turtle, namely, the flatback (Natator depressus), olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) and hawksbill (Eretemochelys imbricata). Marine turtle nests in this area experience high rates of depredation and unpublished data from numerous studies have suggested that feral pigs are responsible for most nest losses. Aims The aim of the present study was to identify the relative magnitude of nest mortality associated with physical processes versus depredation and to distinguishing between two possible pig depredation scenarios. Methods We documented laying and mortality patterns on Pennefarther Beach (CYP) over a 49-day period in 2007. We partitioned mortality into components attributable to beach erosion, inundation and depredation and also assessed the relative magnitude of depredation associated with different nest predators. We used these data to test whether the temporal and spatial pattern of pig depredation was random with respect to patterns of nest availability. Key results The overall level of nest mortality was 40.2%. Depredation was responsible for 93% of nest losses. Pig predation was high, accounting for 89.6% of all mortality. Depredation occurred equally across nests of all three turtle species. Although nests were laid uniformly in both time and space, pig depredation was significantly clustered. Conclusions Depredation by feral pigs was the principal cause of turtle nest mortality in the present study. The pattern of nest destruction was consistent with the occurrence of pig depredation by single individuals in discrete feeding areas. Implications Current feral pig management involves aerial shooting. This is effective at removing large numbers of animals over large areas. However, aerial shooting is also expensive. Our results suggest that targeted monitoring and eradication of locally active individuals depredating nests may better manage pig impacts, specifically those on turtle nests.
机译:背景信息约克角半岛西海岸(CYP)是受威胁的三种海龟的主要筑巢地,它们分别是扁背(Natator depressus),橄榄色ridley(Lepidochelys olivacea)和(Eretemochelys imbricata)。该地区的海龟巢遭到严重破坏,许多研究未发表的数据表明,野生猪是造成巢巢损失最多的原因。目的本研究的目的是确定与物理过程相对于掠夺性相关的窝死亡率的相对大小,并区分两种可能的猪掠夺性情景。方法我们在2007年的49天期间记录了Pennefarther海滩(CYP)的躺下情况和死亡率模式。我们将死亡率分为海滩侵蚀,淹没和掠食造成的部分,并评估了与不同巢穴掠食者相关的掠夺的相对程度。我们使用这些数据来检验猪的掠夺的时空格局是否相对于可利用的巢穴而言是随机的。关键结果巢内死亡率为40.2%。折旧造成了93%的巢穴损失。猪的捕食率很高,占所有死亡率的89.6%。在所有这三种海龟物种的巢中,折旧现象平均发生。尽管在时间和空间上均均匀地筑巢,但猪的掠食行为却明显地聚集在一起。结论野生猪的掠夺是本研究中龟巢死亡的主要原因。巢的破坏模式与离散饲养区域中单个个体对猪的掠食发生一致。启示当前的野猪管理涉及空中射击。这对于在大面积上清除大量动物有效。但是,空中射击也很昂贵。我们的研究结果表明,有针对性的监测和根除在巢中活动的本地个体可能会更好地管理猪的影响,尤其是对龟巢的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号