...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Case study on the implementation of deammonification for the process water treatment of Munich WWTPs
【24h】

Case study on the implementation of deammonification for the process water treatment of Munich WWTPs

机译:慕尼黑污水处理厂工艺水处理脱氨实施案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The two-staged WWTP 'Gut Grosslappen' has a capacity of 2 mio. PE. It comprises a predenitrification in the first stage using recirculation from the nitrifying second stage. A residual postdenitrification in a downstream sand filter is required in order to achieve the effluent standards. Presently the process water from sludge digestion is treated separately by nitrification/denitrification. Due to necessary reconstruction of the biological stages, the process water treatment was included in the future overall process concept of the WWTP. A case study was conducted comparing the processes nitritation/denitrititation and deammonification with nitrification/ denitrification including their effect on the operational costs of the planned main flow treatment. Besides the different operating costs the investment costs required for the process water treatment played a significant role. Six cases for the process water treatment were compared. As a result, in Munich deammonification can only be recommended for long-term future developments, due to the high investment costs, compared with the nitritation/denitritation alternative realizable in existing tanks. The savings concerning aeration, sludge disposal and chemicals were not sufficient to compensate for the additional investment costs. Due to the specific circumstances in Munich, for the time being the use of existing tanks for nitritation/denitritation proved to be most economical.
机译:两阶段的污水处理厂“ Gut Grosslappen”的容量为2毫欧。 PE。它包括在第一阶段使用硝化第二阶段的再循环进行预脱氮。为了达到废水标准,需要在下游的砂滤器中进行残留的反硝化作用。目前,来自污泥消化的工艺水分别通过硝化/反硝化处理。由于生物阶段的必要重建,污水处理厂的未来整体流程概念中已包含了流程水处理。进行了案例研究,比较了硝化/反硝化和脱氨工艺与硝化/反硝化工艺,包括它们对计划的主流处理的运营成本的影响。除了不同的运营成本外,过程水处理所需的投资成本也发挥了重要作用。比较了六个用于过程水处理的案例。因此,与现有储罐中可实现的硝化/反硝化替代方案相比,由于投资成本高,在慕尼黑,仅建议将脱氨技术用于未来的长期发展。曝气,污泥处理和化学药品方面的节省不足以补偿额外的投资成本。由于慕尼黑的特殊情况,暂时证明使用现有的水箱进行硝化/反硝化是最经济的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号