...
首页> 外文期刊>The National medical journal of India >Pain assessment and analgesic prescription for cancer patients in a medical ward: the influence of an educational intervention.
【24h】

Pain assessment and analgesic prescription for cancer patients in a medical ward: the influence of an educational intervention.

机译:病房中癌症患者的疼痛评估和镇痛处方:教育干预的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Pain is present in more than 75% of patients with advanced cancer and is often under-treated. Adequate pain control is an essential component of patient care. By correctly following the WHO analgesic ladder, pain can be controlled in nearly 90% of patients with cancer. Clinical audits help to improve patient care. Hence, an audit was done on documentation of pain and prescription of analgesics in patients with cancer admitted to a medical ward. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit of inpatient charts to assess the adequacy of documentation of pain and prescription of analgesics. Following this, we introduced an educational intervention in the form of teaching, provision of pocket guidelines and displaying a poster with the WHO analgesic guidelines. Subsequently, we conducted a prospective audit of documentation of pain and prescribing practices against the followingstandards: documentation of pain, intensity and response, prescription of analgesics based on WHO guidelines, prescribing breakthrough analgesics and prescribing stimulant laxatives with strong opioids. RESULTS: The retrospective audit included 39 patients and the prospective audit had 34 patients. Pain was documented in 89.7% and 82.4%, pain intensity in 12.8% and 8.8%, and pain response in 12.8% and 11.8%, in the retrospective and prospective audits, respectively. WHO principles were correctly followed in 74.3% and 88.2%, and breakthrough analgesics prescribed in 38.4% and 61.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was improvement in correctly following the WHO analgesic guidelines and prescribing breakthrough analgesics but not in documentation of pain. Clinical audits and interventions such as teaching, pocket guidelines and posters can result in better patient care.
机译:背景:疼痛存在于超过75%的晚期癌症患者中,并且常常未得到充分治疗。适当的疼痛控制是患者护理的重要组成部分。通过正确遵循WHO的止痛阶梯,可以控制近90%的癌症患者的疼痛。临床审核有助于改善患者护理。因此,对入院的癌症患者的疼痛和镇痛药处方进行了审核。方法:我们对住院图表进行了回顾性审核,以评估疼痛记录和止痛药处方的适当性。在此之后,我们以教学,提供袖珍指南的形式以及展示带有WHO镇痛指南的海报的形式引入了教育干预措施。随后,我们对疼痛的文献进行了前瞻性审核,并根据以下标准开了药方:疼痛,强度和反应的文献,基于WHO指南的镇痛药处方,开创性镇痛药处方和强阿片类兴奋性泻药处方。结果:回顾性审核包括39例患者,前瞻性审核包括34例患者。在回顾性和前瞻性审计中,疼痛分别占89.7%和82.4%,疼痛强度分别为12.8%和8.8%,疼痛反应分别为12.8%和11.8%。正确遵循WHO原则的占74.3%和88.2%,突破性镇痛药的比例分别为38.4%和61.8%。结论:正确遵循WHO镇痛指南并开出突破性镇痛药处方有改善,但疼痛记录没有改善。临床审核和干预措施,例如教学,袖珍指南和海报等,可以带来更好的患者护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号