...
首页> 外文期刊>The Mountain Geologist >Testing Laramide Hypotheses for the Colorado Front Range Arch Using Minor Faults
【24h】

Testing Laramide Hypotheses for the Colorado Front Range Arch Using Minor Faults

机译:使用小故障测试科罗拉多州前拱拱的拉拉米德假说

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Controversies regarding vertical and strike-slip Laramide tectonics have served to illuminate the complexities of basement-involved foreland thrust tectonics. The Colorado Front Range is centered on a Laramide basement-cored foreland arch which uplifted the resistant Precambrian rocks that underpin these mountains. The Front Range has been the locus of vigorous debates between advocates of vertical, thaist and strike-slip Laramide tectonics because of its location between northwest-trending arches in Wyoming, which are commonly attributed to thrust deformation, and north-trending arches in New Mexico, which are commonly attributed to right-lateral transpression. In the center of the Front Range arch, exposures of Precambrian crystalline rocks show little evidence of consistent strike-slip separations on north-striking faults. This indicates that major right-lateral displacements, if present, must be located on arch margins. Along the flanks of the northern Front Range, major fault and fold geometries are asymmetric, with more shortening on the large thrust faults to the west than on higher-angle, out-of-the-basin reverse faults to the east. South of Denver, the asymmetry is less dramatic, with major thrusts dipping toward the arch axis in both directions suggesting formation as a thrust-bounded pop-up. The Front Range arch dies southward into the Canon City Embayment where slip was transferred to the frontal and Use thrust faults of the Wet Mountains. Laramide models for the Colorado Front Range were tested using the kinematics of 7837 slickensided minor faults. Average slip and compression axes typically indicate subhorizontal, unimodal shortening and show little evidence of regionally consistent, multi-directional Laramide shortening and compression. These minor faults indicate an overwhelming predominance of horizontal shortening during the Laramide Orogeny. Vertical and normal dip-slip faults are largely restricted to anticlinal hinges, highly rotated strata, and the western arch margin where they can be attributed to post-Laramide extension. The generally high intersection angles of average slickenline and compression orientations with major fault traces indicate dominantly thrust motion on map-scale Laramide faults bounding the Front Range arch. Locally, NW-striking reverse faults can show more vertical than horizontal slip, consistent with their secondary origin as back-limb tightening structures. Average slip and maximum compression axes have average trends of N77E-S77W, with low-angle plunges indicating that arch-perpendicular shortening was more important than arch-parallel strike-slip faulting during the Laramide. These orientations are not consistent with more N-S shortening and compression directions that might be predicted from models invoking large northward right-lateral transport of the Colorado Plateau. Similar numbers of strike-slip and thrust faults do, however, suggest a component of transpressive deformation. A component of right-lateral transpression is indicated by the obliquity between average minor fault shortening directions and the arch axis as well as by the en echelon geometries of both the northeastern flank of the Front Range and the entire Front Range relative to the Wet Mountains and Sangre de Cristo Mountains. This component of transpression may have allowed the front of Laramide deformation to migrate eastward as it moved northward.
机译:有关垂直和走滑拉拉酰胺构造的争论已经阐明了地下室涉及的前陆逆冲构造的复杂性。科罗拉多前山脉以拉拉米德地下室为核心的前陆拱门为中心,该拱门抬高了支撑这些山脉的前寒武纪岩石。前沿山脉一直是垂直,泰式和走滑拉拉米德构造的拥护者激烈辩论的源头,因为它位于怀俄明州西北走向的拱门之间,通常归因于逆冲变形,而新墨西哥州则是北向的拱门。 ,通常归因于右侧压迫。在前岭拱的中心,前寒武纪晶体岩石的暴露几乎没有证据表明在北走向的断层上有一致的走滑分离。这表明,如果存在主要的右侧位移,则必须位于足弓边缘。沿着北部锋面山脉的两侧,主要断层和褶皱的几何形状是不对称的,与西侧较大角度,无盆地的反向断层相比,西侧的大型逆冲断层的缩短幅度更大。在丹佛以南,这种不对称性不太明显,主要推力在两个方向上都向拱轴方向倾斜,表明形成了一个以推力为界的弹出式窗口。前范围拱门向南死入佳能城市使馆,在那里将滑移转移到额山和利用湿山山脉的逆冲断层。使用7837光滑侧小断层的运动学测试了适用于Colorado Front Range的Laramide模型。平均滑移和压缩轴通常表示水平以下的单峰缩短,几乎没有证据表明区域一致的多方向拉拉米德缩短和压缩。这些较小的断层表明,在拉拉蒙造山运动期间,水平缩短的优势占绝对优势。垂直滑坡断层和正常滑坡断层在很大程度上局限于背斜铰链,高度旋转的地层和西部拱缘,在这里它们可以归因于拉拉米特扩张期。平均滑动线和压缩方向与主要断层痕迹的通常较高的相交角表明,在界定前范围拱门的地图比例拉拉米特断层上,推力运动占主导地位。在局部,西北偏向反冲断层的垂直滑移比水平滑移多,这与它们作为后肢收紧结构的次要原点一致。平均滑移和最大压缩轴具有N77E-S77W的平均趋势,低角度下降表明,在拉拉米德期间,弧形垂直缩短比弧形平行走滑断裂更重要。这些方向与更多的N-S缩短和压缩方向不一致,后者可能是通过调用科罗拉多高原向北的大面积右向运输模型预测的。但是,类似数量的走滑断层和逆冲断层确实表明了超压变形的一个组成部分。右平移的一个分量由平均小断层缩短方向和弧线轴之间的倾角以及前山脉东北侧和整个前山脉相对于湿山山脉的梯形几何形状指示。 Sangre de Cristo山。这种压迫作用的成分可能已使Laramide变形的前部向北移动时向东迁移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号