首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >The impact of an electronic prescribing and administration system on the safety and quality of medication administration
【24h】

The impact of an electronic prescribing and administration system on the safety and quality of medication administration

机译:电子处方和给药系统对药物给药的安全性和质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To assess the effect of an electronic prescribing and administration system on the safety and quality of medication administration in a UK hospital. Setting Surgical ward in a teaching hospital.Method Data were collected before and after introducing a closed-loop system comprising electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and electronic medication administration records (ServeRx, MDG Medical). We observed medication administration during drug rounds and assessed medication administration error (MAE) rates for ward-stock and non-ward-stock drugs, accuracy of medication administration documentation, timeliness of administration, administration of medication from unlocked areas and supervision of patients taking oral medication by nursing staff.Key findings Pre- and post-intervention MAE rates were 6.4 and 2.3% respectively for ward-stock drugs (95% confidence interval for the difference (CI) -5.8 to -2.4%), and 14.6 and 13.7% for non-ward-stock drugs (CI -6.5 to 4.7%). Excluding omissions due to unavailability, pre- and post-intervention MAE rates were 6.2 and 2.2% respectively for ward-stock drugs (CI -5.7 to -2.3%), and 9.2 and 3.5% for non-ward-stock drugs (CI -9.3 to -2.1 %). Pre-intervention, 2086 doses (96.3%) were documented correctly and 1557 (95.9%) post-intervention (CI -1.6 to 0.8%). There were five clinically significant documentation discrepancies pre-intervention (0.2%), and 33 (2.0%) afterwards (CI 1.1 to 2.5%). Timeliness of administration improved post-intervention (P < 0.001; Chi-square test), as did administration of medication from unlocked areas (CI 4.7 to 7.3%) and supervision of patients taking oral medication (CI 17 to 23%).Conclusion Reductions in MAEs, excluding omissions due to unavailability, occurred for both ward-stock and non-ward-stock drugs. The system also improved timeliness and security of drug administration. However, there was an increase in potentially significant documentation discrepancies.
机译:目的评估电子处方和给药系统对英国医院用药安全性和质量的影响。方法在教学医院中设置手术病房。方法在引入包括电子处方,自动分配,条形码患者识别和电子药物管理记录(ServeRx,MDG Medical)的闭环系统之前和之后收集数据。我们观察了在药物回合期间的用药情况,并评估了有库存和无库存药物的用药错误率(MAE),用药文件的准确性,用药及时性,在非锁定区域用药的用药情况以及对服用口服药物的患者的监督主要发现病房药物干预前和干预后的MAE发生率分别为6.4%和2.3%(差异(CI)的95%置信区间-5.8至-2.4%),14.6和13.7%适用于非常规库存药物(CI -6.5至4.7%)。排除因无法获得而造成的遗漏,干预前和干预后病房药物的MAE率分别为6.2%和2.2%(CI -5.7至-2.3%),非病房药物的MAE率分别为9.2%和3.5%(CI- 9.3至-2.1%)。干预前正确记录了2086剂(96.3%),干预后正确记录了1557剂(95.9%)(CI -1.6至0.8%)。干预前有五个临床上显着的文献差异(0.2%),之后有33个(2.0%)(CI 1.1至2.5%)。干预后的及时性改善了(P <0.001;卡方检验),未锁定区域的药物管理(CI 4.7至7.3%)以及对口服药物患者的监督(CI 17至23%)也得到了改善。在MAE中,无论是有病房还是非有病房的药物都发生了由于不可用而导致的遗漏。该系统还提高了药物管理的及时性和安全性。但是,潜在的重大文档差异有所增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号