...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >Repeat dispensing of prescriptions in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the UK literature
【24h】

Repeat dispensing of prescriptions in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the UK literature

机译:在社区药房重复分发处方:对英国文献的系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To identify, review and evaluate the published literature that focused on the impact of repeat dispensing in community pharmacies in the United Kingdom. Method Electronic databases (e.g. Medline, Embase and CINAHL) were searched from 1992 to May 2005. This was supplemented by searching PJ-online, IJPP online conference abstracts and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Analysis of the findings explored the quality of the assessed papers, stakeholders' perceptions of repeat dispensing, the impact on professional relationships and workload, quality of care and prescription cost savings. Key findings Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and one before-and-after study were identified; most studies also incorporated a qualitative component. The findings indicated that patients' satisfaction with repeat dispensing was high, mainly as the service was seen as more convenient and time saving. While pharmacists considered that their relationship with patients had improved, one study found that patients did not necessarily agree and considered that pharmacists still remained in their dispensaries. Quality of care was considered in two RCTs, which indicated that more adverse reactions and compliance issues were identified in the intervention group. However, no direct comparisons were reported in differences in rates between intervention and control groups. Likewise, it was not possible to determine if any of the reported cost savings were solely attributable to repeat dispensing, as direct comparisons between groups were not reported. Conclusions:Definitive conclusions about the effectiveness and impact of repeat dispensing are difficult to draw given a lack of transparency and systematicity when reporting these studies. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that there are high levels of patient satisfaction with the service. Likewise, it was not possible to draw conclusions about the possible savings on the NHS drug budget. Important policy decisions are being made about the implementation of repeat dispensing; however they are currently been made in a vacuum of adequate information.
机译:目的确定,审查和评估已发表的文献,这些文献的重点是英国社区药房重复点胶的影响。方法从1992年至2005年5月,检索电子数据库(例如Medline,Embase和CINAHL)。此外,还通过搜索PJ-online,IJPP在线会议摘要和检索到的文献目录来进行补充。对调查结果的分析探讨了评估论文的质量,利益相关者对重复配药的看法,对专业关系和工作量的影响,护理质量和处方成本节省。主要发现确定了四项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项前后研究。大多数研究还纳入了定性成分。研究结果表明,患者对重复配药的满意度很高,主要是因为该服务更方便,更省时。药剂师认为与患者的关系有所改善,但一项研究发现患者不一定同意,并认为药剂师仍留在药房中。在两个RCT中考虑了护理质量,这表明干预组中发现了更多的不良反应和依从性问题。但是,没有直接比较报道干预组和对照组之间的比率差异。同样,由于没有报告各组之间的直接比较,因此无法确定所报告的成本节省是否仅归因于重复分配。结论:由于在报告这些研究时缺乏透明度和系统性,因此很难得出关于重复分配的有效性和影响的明确结论。然而,研究结果表明,患者对该服务的满意度很高。同样,也无法就NHS药品预算可能的节省得出结论。正在制定有关重复分配的重要政策决策;但是,它们目前是在足够信息的真空中制成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号