首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Fracture toughness (K(IC) of a hot-pressed core ceramic based on fractographic analysis of fractured ceramic FPDs.
【24h】

Fracture toughness (K(IC) of a hot-pressed core ceramic based on fractographic analysis of fractured ceramic FPDs.

机译:基于断裂的陶瓷FPD的分形分析的热压型芯陶瓷的断裂韧性(K(IC))。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the fracture toughness (K(IC)) of an experimental hot-pressed core ceramic measured by fractographic analysis of failed ceramic prostheses and the values determined by other standard methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were subjected to one of four test methods: group 1 = indentation strength technique (standard numerical calculation); group 2 = indentation strength technique (fractographic analysis); group 3 = flexure test of precracked specimens (fractographic analysis); and group 4 = fractographic analysis of failed three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPD). For groups 1 to 3, 20 ceramic bar specimens were subjected to three-point flexure at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred. For group 4, 10 failed FPDs were collected from a previous study. Stress values at failure were calculated from either a flexure stress equation (groups 1 to 3) or from finite element analyses (group 4). K(IC) values were calculated from an equation and fractographic measurement data. RESULTS: Mean fracture toughness ranged from 3.1 MPa x m1/2 (SD 0.2) (group 1) to 3.4 MPa x m1/2 (SD 0.2) (group 4). The mean K(IC) value for group 1 was significantly different from that of group 4; however, no significant differences were found between groups 1, 2, and 3, or between groups 2, 3, and 4. CONCLUSION: Fracture toughness for an experimental hot-pressed core ceramic measured by fractographic analysis in combination with finite element analysis was comparable with the values determined with other standard fractographic methods.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是检验以下假设:通过对失效的陶瓷假体进行分形分析所测得的实验性热压型芯陶瓷的断裂韧性(K(IC))与其他方法确定的值之间没有显着差异标准方法。材料与方法:四组接受四种测试方法之一:第一组=压痕强度技术(标准数值计算);第二组=压痕强度技术(标准数值计算)。第2组=压痕强度技术(分形分析);第3组=预裂试样的弯曲试验(形貌分析);第4组=失败的三单元固定局部义齿(FPD)的分形分析。对于第1组至第3组,以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度对20个陶瓷棒样品进行三点弯曲,直到发生断裂。对于第4组,从先前的研究中收集了10个失败的FPD。失效时的应力值是根据挠曲应力方程(第1组至第3组)或有限元分析(第4组)来计算的。 K(IC)值由方程式和分形测量数据计算得出。结果:平均断裂韧性范围为3.1 MPa x m1 / 2(SD 0.2)(第1组)至3.4 MPa x m1 / 2(SD 0.2)(第4组)。第1组的平均K(IC)值与第4组的显着不同;但是,在第1、2和3组之间,或在第2、3和4组之间没有发现显着差异。结论:通过分形分析与有限元分析相结合测量的实验热压型芯陶瓷的断裂韧性是可比的与其他标准分形方法确定的值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号