首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry >Comparison of in vitro tensile bond strengths of luting cements to metallic and tooth-colored posts.
【24h】

Comparison of in vitro tensile bond strengths of luting cements to metallic and tooth-colored posts.

机译:胶合水泥对金属和牙齿色桩的体外拉伸粘结强度比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the tensile bond strength of tooth-colored ceramic and carbon-fiber post materials as well as titanium and stainless steel post materials luted with three different kinds of luting cements. Disks of alloy post materials were polished with 600-grit SiC paper, air abraded, and ultrasonically cleaned. Ceramic surfaces were pretreated with hydrofluoric acid and silanized. Panavia F, Vitremer, and ProTec Cem cements were bonded to the post specimens and placed in a humidor for 24 hours. Specimens were placed in a jig, and the debonding values were obtained using a universal testing machine. Means and standard deviations were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Panavia F provided the highest bond strengths for all types of post materials. ProTec Cem bonded more strongly to stainless steel and titanium than to zirconium oxide. Vitremer results were the lowest. Bonds to carbon-fiber post materials were weaker than to metallic post materials, but stronger than to zirconium oxide. In general, higher bond strengths resulted in a higher percentage of cohesive failures.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较牙齿色陶瓷和碳纤维桩材料以及钛和不锈钢桩材料用三种不同的胶合剂胶合后的抗拉强度。合金桩材料的圆盘用600粒度的SiC纸抛光,空气研磨并超声清洗。陶瓷表面用氢氟酸预处理并硅烷化。将Panavia F,Vitremer和ProTec Cem水泥粘结到柱后样品上,并放置在雪茄盒中24小时。将样品放置在夹具中,并使用通用测试机获得脱粘值。均值和标准差通过双向方差分析进行分析。 Panavia F为所有类型的邮政材料提供了最高的粘结强度。 ProTec Cem与不锈钢和钛的结合比与氧化锆的结合更牢固。 Vitremer结果最低。碳纤维桩材料的结合力弱于金属桩材料,但比氧化锆强。通常,较高的粘结强度导致较高的内聚破坏百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号