...
首页> 外文期刊>Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift >Evaluation of the mini-FLOTAC technique for detection of gastro-intestinal parasites in large companion animals
【24h】

Evaluation of the mini-FLOTAC technique for detection of gastro-intestinal parasites in large companion animals

机译:小型FLOTAC技术在大型伴侣动物中检测胃肠道寄生虫的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A new technique, mini-FLOTAC, has recently been developed for the microscopic diagnosis of infections with gastro-intestinal nematodes in domestic animals. In this comparative study of diagnostic techniques, the mini-FLOTAC technique was compared to the commonly used McMaster technique for the detection and quantification of gastro-intestinal parasites in livestock as well as for the evaluation of the time needed to perform the assays. One hundred fecal samples (78 horses, 11 bovines, 6 sheep and 5 goats) were examined with both the mini-FLOTAC and McMaster technique. This revealed that more infections with gastro-intestinal parasites could be diagnosed with the mini-FLOTAC technique than with the McMaster technique, but the comparative study also showed a very high correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.90, p < 0.001) between both techniques regarding the number of eggs per gram feces (EPG) detected. The time needed to examine the samples with the mini-FLOTAC technique (13 minutes) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the time needed with the McMaster technique (6 minutes). This difference in time also depended on the observed EPG value, as with high EPG values, the difference in time between both techniques increased even more. In conclusion, the mini-FLOTAC technique can be preferred when an accurate diagnosis of a low infection level is necessary, e.g. to detect anthelmintic resistance. In other circumstances, the faster McMaster technique can be considered as the preferable technique.
机译:最近已经开发了一种新技术,即mini-FLOTAC,用于显微诊断家畜中的胃肠道线虫感染。在此诊断技术的比较研究中,将mini-FLOTAC技术与常用的McMaster技术进行了比较,以检测和定量家畜中的胃肠道寄生虫,并评估执行测定所需的时间。用mini-FLOTAC和McMaster技术检查了100份粪便样品(78匹马,11头牛,6只绵羊和5只山羊)。这表明用mini-FLOTAC技术比用McMaster技术可诊断出更多的胃肠道寄生虫感染,但对比研究还表明,两种技术之间的相关性非常高(相关系数= 0.90,p <0.001)。每克粪便(EPG)中检测到的卵数。使用mini-FLOTAC技术检查样品所需的时间(13分钟)比使用McMaster技术所需的时间(6分钟)明显更高(P <0.05)。时间上的差异还取决于观察到的EPG值,因为使用高EPG值时,两种技术之间的时间差异甚至更大。总而言之,当需要对低感染水平进行准确诊断时(例如,感染率较高),最好使用mini-FLOTAC技术。以检测驱虫药的抵抗力。在其他情况下,可以将较快的McMaster技术视为首选技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号