首页> 外文期刊>Vision Research: An International Journal in Visual Science >Objective depth-of-focus is different from subjective depth-of-focus and correlated with accommodative microfluctuations.
【24h】

Objective depth-of-focus is different from subjective depth-of-focus and correlated with accommodative microfluctuations.

机译:客观的景深不同于主观的景深,并且与调节性微波动相关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we investigated whether the objective depth-of-focus (DOF) is different from the subjective DOF and whether it correlates to accommodative microfluctuations (AMF). The objective DOF and subjective DOF at 1.5 D accommodative stimulus (AS) level were compared in the same group of subjects. The objective DOF and magnitude of AMF were measured at 5 AS levels from 0 D to 4 D. Results showed that there was a significant difference and no correlation between the objective DOF and the subjective DOF. The objective DOF was correlated to the magnitude of AMF. The results suggest that objective DOF and subjective DOF represent the blur sensitivity of two different systems. AMF are correlated with the blur sensitivity of the accommodative system.
机译:在这项研究中,我们调查了客观景深(DOF)是否与主观景深不同以及它是否与调节性微波动(AMF)相关。在同一组受试者中比较了1.5 D调节刺激(AS)水平下的客观自由度和主观自由度。在从0 D到4 D的5个AS水平下,测量了目标自由度和AMF的大小。结果表明,目标自由度和主观自由度之间存在显着差异,并且没有相关性。客观自由度与AMF的大小相关。结果表明,客观自由度和主观自由度代表了两个不同系统的模糊敏感性。 AMF与调节系统的模糊灵敏度相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号