...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound >A NOVEL SUPPORT DEVICE FOR HEAD IMMOBILIZATION DURING RADIATION THERAPY THAT IS APPLICABLE TO BOTH CATS AND DOGS
【24h】

A NOVEL SUPPORT DEVICE FOR HEAD IMMOBILIZATION DURING RADIATION THERAPY THAT IS APPLICABLE TO BOTH CATS AND DOGS

机译:适用于猫和狗的辐射治疗过程中用于头部固定的新型支持设备

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Repeatable head immobilization is important for minimizing positioning error during radiation therapy for veterinary patients with head neoplasms. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to describe a novel technique for head immobilization (Device II) and compare this technique with a previously described technique (Device I). Device II provided additional support by incorporating three teeth (vs. two teeth with Device I). Between 2011 and 2013, both devices were applied in clinically affected cats (Device I, n = 17; Device II, n = 11) and dogs (Device I, n = 85; Device II, n = 22) of various breeds and sizes. The following data were recorded for each included patient: variability in the angle of the skull (roll, yaw, and pitch), coordinates of the isocenter, and distance from the reference mark to the tumor. Devices I and II differed for skull angle variability during the treatment of dogs (roll, P = 0.0007; yaw, P = 0.0018; pitch, P = 0.0384) and for yaw of during the treatment of cats (P < 0.0001). In each case, Device II was superior to Device I. The distance from the reference mark to the center of the tumor was significantly decreased for Device II vs. Device I (dogs, P < 0.0001; cats, P = 0.0002). Device II also provided more accurate coordinates for the isocenter. Authors recommend the use of, Device II for future clinical patients. (C) 2015 American College of Veterinary Radiology.
机译:可重复进行的头部固定对于最大程度减少头肿瘤的兽医患者在放射治疗期间的定位误差非常重要。这项回顾性横断面研究的目的是描述一种用于头部固定的新技术(设备II),并将该技术与先前描述的技术(设备I)进行比较。设备II通过合并三个牙齿(设备I为两个牙齿)提供了额外的支持。在2011年至2013年之间,这两种设备均应用于各种品种和大小的受临床影响的猫(设备I,n = 17;设备II,n = 11)和狗(设备I,n = 85;设备II,n = 22)。 。记录了每个患者的以下数据:颅骨角度的变化(侧倾,偏航和俯仰),等中心点的坐标以及从参考标记到肿瘤的距离。设备I和设备II在处理狗的过程中颅骨角可变性(滚动,P = 0.0007;偏航,P = 0.0018;俯仰,P = 0.0384)和治疗猫期间的偏航(P <0.0001)有所不同。在每种情况下,设备II均优于设备I。设备II与设备I相比,从参考标记到肿瘤中心的距离明显减小(狗,P <0.0001;猫,P = 0.0002)。设备II还为等中心线提供了更准确的坐标。作者建议将Device II用于未来的临床患者。 (C)2015年美国兽医放射学院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号