首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Parasitology >Questionnaire study on parasite control practices on Thoroughbred and Standardbred breeding farms in New Zealand
【24h】

Questionnaire study on parasite control practices on Thoroughbred and Standardbred breeding farms in New Zealand

机译:新西兰纯种和标准良种养殖场寄生虫控制做法的问卷调查研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Against a global background of increasing anthelmintic resistance in parasites, little is known about the current parasite control strategies adopted within the equine industry in New Zealand. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the current parasite management and control practices used on Thoroughbred and Standardbred stud farms in New Zealand. An online questionnaire was used to collect data on the demographics of respondents, parasite control methods, grazing management, and use of faecal egg counts. Questions regarding parasite control strategy, how often horses were dewormed, number of treatments per year and stocking density were stratified by horse type: young stock (foals/weanlings/yearlings), wet mares (nursing a foal) or dry mares, and industry (Thoroughbred and Standardbred). Questions on grazing management were stratified by horse type and the breeding and non-breeding season. In total, 136 respondents completed the survey, of which most (66%; 90/136) were involved in the Thoroughbred breeding industry. Most (98%; 134/136) respondents used anthelmintic products to treat the horses on their property, and regardless of industry type most respondents were using interval drenching for young stock (86/129; 53%), dry mares (51/124; 41%) or wet mares (50/126; 40%). Of those respondents treating on regular interval, 55% (68/123), 42% (50/119) and 38% (46/122) were treating young stock, wet mares and dry mares every 6-8 weeks. The median number of treatments per year for young stock, dry mares and wet mares was 6 (IQR 4-8), 4 (IQR 3-6) and 4 (IQR 3-6), respectively; there was no difference in frequency of treatments by industry type. In the last 12 months respondents used a median of 2 (IQR 2-4) and 3 (IQR 2-4) different anthelmintic products to treat horses on Thoroughbred and Standardbred breeding farms, respectively. Of the respondents reporting the anthelmintic products used in the last 12 months, 95% used at least one product containing macrocyclic lactones. Overall, faecal egg counts were done by 20% (25/124) of respondents and over half of respondents in both industries were consulting their veterinarian for advice on worming products. This study identified a high reliance on anthelmintic products and limited on-farm control practices that would delay the development of anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites. Further research is now required to identify the level of resistance in the New Zealand equine parasite population. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在寄生虫驱虫抗药性增加的全球背景下,对新西兰马产业当前采用的寄生虫控制策略知之甚少。这项研究的目的是描述和比较新西兰纯种和标准种马养殖场目前使用的寄生虫管理和控制方法。使用在线调查表收集有关受访者的人口统计数据,寄生虫控制方法,放牧管理和粪便卵数的使用。有关寄生虫控制策略,对马进行驱虫的频率,每年的处理次数和放养密度的问题按马的类型进行了分层:幼种(驹/断奶/幼鸽/一岁),湿母马(哺育小马驹)或干母马,以及行业(纯种和纯种)。关于放牧管理的问题按马的类型以及繁殖和非繁殖季节进行了分层。共有136位受访者完成了调查,其中大部分(66%; 90/136)与纯种育种行业有关。大部分(98%; 134/136)的受访者使用驱虫产品来治疗马匹,无论行业类型如何,大多数受访者都对幼畜(86/129; 53%),干母马使用间歇性浇水; 41%)或湿母马(50/126; 40%)。在定期进行治疗的受访者中,每6-8周有55%(68/123),42%(50/119)和38%(46/122)的幼鸽,湿母马和干母马进行治疗。幼年母马,干母马和湿母马每年治疗的中位数分别为6(IQR 4-8),4(IQR 3-6)和4(IQR 3-6);各行业类型的治疗频率没有差异。在过去的12个月中,受访者分别使用中位数2种(IQR 2-4)和3种(IQR 2-4)的驱虫剂来治疗纯种和标准繁殖场的马匹。在报告最近12个月内使用过驱虫药的受访者中,有95%的受访者至少使用了一种含有大环内酯的产品。总体而言,粪便鸡蛋计数是由20%(25/124)的受访者完成的,两个行业中超过一半的受访者正在咨询其兽医以获取有关蠕虫产品的建议。这项研究确定了对驱虫药的高度依赖和有限的农场控制措施,这些措施会延迟马寄生虫对驱虫药的抵抗。现在需要进一步的研究来确定新西兰马寄生虫种群中的抗药性水平。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号