...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Parasitology >Humoral immunological profile and parasitological statuses of Leishmune (R) vaccinated and visceral leishmaniasis infected dogs from an endemic area
【24h】

Humoral immunological profile and parasitological statuses of Leishmune (R) vaccinated and visceral leishmaniasis infected dogs from an endemic area

机译:地方病地区接种过利什曼(R)疫苗和内脏利什曼病的狗的体液免疫学特征和寄生虫状况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Dogs represent the major reservoir of Leishmaniao chagasi and vaccination against the canine disease is a potential control strategy. However, seroconversion occurs post-vaccine and hence, there is need to discriminate between the former group and naturally infected dogs. The present study represents a comparison of the humoral immunological profiles of both groups using Leishmania soluble antigen (LSA) and fucose-mannose ligand (FML). For both categories, ear skin samples were evaluated immunohistochemically and through PCR, that was also performed in blood specimens, as well as their ability to infect Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) longipalpis. All these tests showed negative results for the vaccinated dogs. Differences between groups were observed regarding IgG, IgG2 and IgE absorbances as determined by FML-ELISA, and for IgG1 and IgE absorbances as measured by LSA-ELISA, showing that Leishmune (R)-immunised animals and VL naturally infected dogs present different immunological profiles, even though these differences cannot be used to distinguish between these two groups of dogs
机译:狗代表了利什曼鸟的主要储藏地,针对犬类疾病的疫苗接种是一种潜在的控制策略。然而,在疫苗接种后发生血清转化,因此需要区分前一组和自然感染的狗。本研究代表使用利什曼原虫可溶性抗原(LSA)和岩藻糖-甘露糖配体(FML)对两组的体液免疫学特征进行比较。对于这两种类别,均通过免疫组织化学和PCR评估了耳皮肤样本,该样本也在血液样本中进行了评估,还评估了它们感染长足卢氏菌(Lutzomyia)的能力。所有这些测试对接种的狗显示阴性结果。观察到两组之间的差异,如通过FML-ELISA测定的IgG,IgG2和IgE吸光度,以及通过LSA-ELISA测定的IgG1和IgE吸光度,表明Leishmune(R)免疫的动物和VL自然感染的狗表现出不同的免疫学特征,即使这些差异不能用来区分这两组狗

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号