...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Microbiology >Evaluation of antibody-ELISA and real-time RT-PCR for the diagnosis and profiling of bluetongue virus serotype 8 during the epidemic in Belgium in 2006.
【24h】

Evaluation of antibody-ELISA and real-time RT-PCR for the diagnosis and profiling of bluetongue virus serotype 8 during the epidemic in Belgium in 2006.

机译:评估抗体-ELISA和实时RT-PCR在比利时于2006年大流行期间诊断和诊断蓝舌病毒血清型8。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2006 bluetongue (BT) emerged for the first time in North-Western Europe. Reliable diagnostic tools are essential in controlling BT but data on the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) are often missing. This paper aims to describe and analyse the results obtained with the diagnostics used in Belgium during the 2006 BT crisis. The diagnosis was based on a combination of antibody detection (competitive ELISA, cELISA) and viral RNA detection by real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). The performance of the cELISA as a diagnostic tool was assessed on field results obtained during the epidemic and previous surveillance campaigns. As the infectious status of the animals is unknown during an epidemic, a Bayesian analysis was performed. Both assays were found to be equally specific (RT-qPCR: 98.5%; cELISA: 98.2%) while the diagnostic sensitivity of the RT-qPCR (99.5%) was superior to that of the cELISA (87.8%). The assumption of RT-qPCR as standard of comparison during the bluetongue virus (BTV) epidemic proved valid based on the results of the Bayesian analysis. A ROC analysis of the cELISA, using RT-qPCR as standard of comparison, showed that the cut-off point with the highest accuracy occurred at a percentage negativity of 66, which is markedly higher than the cut-off proposed by the manufacturer. The analysis of the results was further extended to serological and molecular profiling and the possible use of profiling as a rapid epidemiological marker of the BTV in-field situation was assessed. A comparison of the serological profiles obtained before, during and at the end of the Belgian epidemic clearly showed the existence of an intermediate zone which appears soon after BTV (re)enters the population. The appearance or disappearance of this intermediate zone is correlated with virus circulation and provides valuable information, which would be entirely overlooked if only positive and negative results were considered.
机译:2006年,蓝舌病(BT)首次出现在西北欧洲。可靠的诊断工具对于控制BT是必不可少的,但通常缺少诊断敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)的数据。本文旨在描述和分析在2006年英国电信危机期间使用比利时诊断程序获得的结果。诊断是基于抗体检测(竞争性ELISA,cELISA)和实时RT-PCR(RT-qPCR)检测病毒RNA的结合。根据在流行病和先前的监视活动中获得的现场结果评估了cELISA作为诊断工具的性能。由于在流行期间动物的感染状况未知,因此进行了贝叶斯分析。发现这两种测定法具有相同的特异性(RT-qPCR:98.5%; cELISA:98.2%),而RT-qPCR的诊断灵敏度(99.5%)优于cELISA(87.8%)。根据贝叶斯分析的结果,证明RT-qPCR作为蓝舌病(BTV)流行期间的比较标准是正确的。使用RT-qPCR作为比较标准的cELISA的ROC分析表明,具有最高准确度的分界点出现在负百分比为66的情况下,这明显高于制造商提出的分界点。结果分析进一步扩展到血清学和分子谱分析,并评估了将谱分析用作BTV现场情况的快速流行病学标记的可能性。比利时流行病之前,之中和结束时获得的血清学特征的比较清楚地表明存在中间区域,该中间区域在BTV(重新)进入人群后不久出现。该中间区的出现或消失与病毒的传播相关,并提供了有价值的信息,如果仅考虑阳性和阴性结果,这些信息将被完全忽略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号