...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Medicine >Have we been doinq it wronq? Ovariectomy vs. ovariohysterectomy in small-animal prsictice
【24h】

Have we been doinq it wronq? Ovariectomy vs. ovariohysterectomy in small-animal prsictice

机译:我们去过吗?小动物实践中的卵巢切除术与卵巢子宫切除术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The benefits of surgical gonadec-tomy for female dogs and cats are well-established and unquestioned. However, recent literature has challenged the status of ovariohysterectomy (OVH) as the accepted standard of care for female sterilization here in the United States.1 In some European countries, ovariectomy (OVE) has replaced OVH as the standard procedure advocated. It is understandable that practitioners would be skeptical to abandon OVH, a procedure that most can perform quickly and efficiently, typically with little patient morbidity. Proponents of OVE claim the procedure may create less morbidity than OVH, with no difference in long-term complication rates.
机译:对雌性狗和猫进行手术性淋巴结切除术的好处是公认的,而且毫无疑问。但是,最近的文献挑战了在美国,卵巢子宫切除术(OVH)作为女性绝育的公认治疗标准的地位。1在一些欧洲国家,卵巢切除术(OVE)取代了卵巢切除术成为倡导的标准程序。可以理解的是,从业者会对放弃OVH持怀疑态度,OVH是大多数人可以快速,有效地执行的程序,通常患者的发病率很小。 OVE的支持者声称,该手术的发病率比OVH少,且长期并发症发生率无差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号