...
首页> 外文期刊>Vascular >A comparison of three tumescent delivery systems in endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein
【24h】

A comparison of three tumescent delivery systems in endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein

机译:大隐静脉静脉激光消融中三种肿胀传递系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Different systems for delivering tumescent solution exist in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). This study evaluated three different tumescent delivery systems in patients with primary varicose veins due to great saphenous vein reflux who were treated with EVLA. In this prospective non-randomized study, 60 patients with isolated GSV varicose veins were divided into three groups. All patients received EVLA treatment. Three different tumescent solution delivery systems were used. Systems consisted of a needle and a syringe in Group 1, a needle connected to an infusion bag system in Group 2 and a peristaltic infiltration pump in Group 3. Tumescent delivery durations were in Group 1: 6.56 SD 1.18 minutes. Group 2: 6.05 SD 2.19 minutes and Group 3: 5.19 SD 1.15 minutes (P= 0.014). In the outcomes of the study there were no significant difference between groups. Although peristaltic pump systems might provide shorter tumescent delivery durations without hand fatigue, shorter duration does not have any practical importance (about 1 minute and also it is not cost-effective. For delivering tumescent solutions in EVLA procedures, there was no major superiority between systems.
机译:静脉内激光消融(EVLA)中存在用于传递肿胀溶液的不同系统。这项研究评估了EVLA治疗的大隐静脉返流引起的原发性静脉曲张患者的三种不同的肿胀传递系统。在这项前瞻性非随机研究中,将60例孤立的GSV静脉曲张患者分为三组。所有患者均接受了EVLA治疗。使用了三种不同的膨胀溶液递送系统。系统由第1组中的针头和注射器,第2组中的连接到输液袋系统的针和第3组中的蠕动渗透泵组成。肿胀的持续时间在第1组中:6.56 SD 1.18分钟。第2组:6.05 SD 2.19分钟,第3组:5.19 SD 1.15分钟(P = 0.014)。在研究结果中,各组之间无显着差异。尽管蠕动泵系统可以提供较短的肿胀递送持续时间而不会造成手部疲劳,但是较短的持续时间没有任何实际意义(大约1分钟,并且也不具成本效益。)在EVLA程序中递送肿胀解决方案时,系统之间没有主要优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号