...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology >The effects of screw placement on plate strain in 3.5 mm dynamic compression plates and limited-contact dynamic compression plates
【24h】

The effects of screw placement on plate strain in 3.5 mm dynamic compression plates and limited-contact dynamic compression plates

机译:螺钉放置对3.5 mm动态压缩板和有限接触动态压缩板中板应变的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of screw omission on plate strain during axial load to failure and cycling using a Delrin rod gap model. In addition, the differences between the 3.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) and the 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate (DCP) were evaluated. Six, 12-hole LC-DCP and DCP plates were applied to Delrin rods with a 1 cm gap located within the central portion of the plate. Six screw configurations were tested with the following variations: three proximal and three distal (six open), four proximal and three distal (five open), four proximal and four distal (four open), five proximal and four distal (three open), five proximal and five distal (two open), six proximal and five distal (one open). Three strain gauges were mounted on each plate within the gap (gauge three) and extended proximally. Additionally, three constructs (six, three, and one open hole) were tested to failure in cyclic loading. The strain measured within the gap (gauge three) was significantly greater than the strain at other gauges for each screw configuration. Strain within the gap did not significantly change with any screw configuration, but did significantly increase at other locations as screws were omitted. Overall, the DCP withstood significantly more cycles than the LC-DCP. Differences were noted within the DCP group with the 6/5 screw configuration lasting for significantly more cycles than the 5/4 and 3/3 constructs. Although overall strain at the gap did not significantly increase with screw omission, the clinical significance remains to be determined.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用Delrin杆间隙模型评估在轴向载荷破坏和循环过程中螺钉遗漏对板应变的影响。此外,评估了3.5毫米有限接触动态压缩板(LC-DCP)和3.5毫米动态压缩板(DCP)之间的差异。将六块12孔LC-DCP和DCP板应用于Delrin棒,并在板的中心部分留有1 cm的间隙。测试了六种螺钉配置,其变化如下:三个近端和三个远端(六个开口),四个近端和三个远端(五个开口),四个近端和四个远端(四个开口),五个近端和四个远端(三个开口),五个近端和五个远端(两个开口),六个近端和五个远端(一个开口)。将三个应变仪安装在间隙内的每个板上(三个规)并向近端延伸。此外,测试了三种构造(六个,三个和一个裸眼)在循环载荷下的破坏。对于每种螺钉配置,在间隙(三号规)内测得的应变显着大于其他规格下的应变。间隙内的应变不会因任何螺钉配置而显着变化,但由于省略了螺钉,在其他位置并未显着增加。总体而言,DCP比LC-DCP承受的周期要多得多。在DCP组中发现了差异,其中6/5螺钉配置比5/4和3/3构造持续了更多的周期。尽管螺钉遗漏并未使间隙处的总应变明显增加,但临床意义仍有待确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号