首页> 外文期刊>Valve World >Ingolf's insight: Part 3
【24h】

Ingolf's insight: Part 3

机译:Ingolf的见解:第3部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do end-users really care about fugitive emission, or do they only want cheaper valves? So what about high density die formed graphite packings? To answer that, we have to take a look back to Part 2 of this article. The main issue of getting a good seal is contact between the packings and the spindle/bonnet before the compression of the packing rings starts. This is more important with high-density rings since they have a lower compression grade (10-12%). There are other elements besides the packing rings that have to be addressed, and that is the shape, dimensions and the tolerances of the spindle and packing groove in the valve bonnet If we look at Figure 12, this is a graph from one packing manufacturer This graph shows us some important details: The surface finish on the stem should be Ra ≤ 0,5 μm and the surface finish in the groove should be Ra ≤ 2,0μm. This is understandable because the stem is a dynamic seal, and the wall of the groove is a stationary seal. We don't want a coarse stem that tears away the packing material when operated. The depth of the groove L is approx. five times S, which is the cross-section of the packing. Then, one very important small detail: The distance between the stem/bonnet and stem/packing compression ring, indicated with two red arrows must not be more then 0,03 millimetre times S (cross-section of the packing). This is extremely important when dealing with high density Grafoil rings. If the distance between the stem and the packing compression ring is too great, you may end up with packing extruded by the system pressure as shown in Figures 13 and 14. Both packings used are high density Grafoil rings in high pressure gas applications. Both valves had a clearing between the spindle and the packing compression ring that was way too large. Both cases led to major gas leaks and total shut down of the plants. These are only two examples of a situation that, unfortunately, is not totally uncommon. These were major gas leaks, not fugitive emission, you could say. But there is a link here, a link between tolerances, packing material, packing treatment and small or larger leaks.
机译:最终用户是否真的在乎逃逸排放,还是只想要便宜的阀门?那么高密度压铸石墨填料呢?为了回答这个问题,我们必须回顾一下本文的第2部分。获得良好密封的主要问题是在填料环开始压缩之前填料与主轴/阀盖之间的接触。对于高密度环,这更重要,因为它们的压缩等级较低(10-12%)。除了填料环外,还有其他一些元素需要解决,即阀盖上阀杆和填料槽的形状,尺寸和公差如果我们看一下图12,这是一家填料制造商的图表。该图向我们显示了一些重要的细节:阀杆上的表面粗糙度应为Ra≤0.5μm,凹槽中的表面粗糙度应为Ra≤2.0μm。这是可以理解的,因为杆是动态密封,而凹槽的壁是固定密封。我们不希望操作时粗大的杆会撕掉包装材料。凹槽L的深度为大约1mm。五倍于S,这是填料的横截面。然后,是一个非常重要的小细节:阀杆/阀盖与阀杆/填料的压缩环之间的距离(用两个红色箭头表示)不得超过0,03毫米乘以S(填料的横截面)。当处理高密度的Grafoil环时,这非常重要。如果阀杆和填料压紧环之间的距离太大,则最终可能会由于系统压力而挤出填料,如图13和14所示。在高压气体应用中,使用的两种填料都是高密度Grafoil环。两个阀在主轴和填料压紧环之间都有很大的间隙。两种情况均导致重大的天然气泄漏并完全关闭了工厂。不幸的是,这只是情况的两个例子,并不少见。您可以说,这是主要的煤气泄漏,而不是逃逸性排放。但是这里有一个联系,公差,包装材料,包装处理和小或大泄漏之间的联系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Valve World》 |2013年第5期|共2页
  • 作者

    Christian Borrmann;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 TH134.1;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号