...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Deterioration of quality of life of high-risk breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy: the PEGASE 01 Quality of Life Study.
【24h】

Deterioration of quality of life of high-risk breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy: the PEGASE 01 Quality of Life Study.

机译:高剂量化疗治疗的高危乳腺癌患者的生活质量恶化:PEGASE 01生活质量研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life (QOL) of high-risk breast cancer patients included in a randomized clinical trial (PEGASE 01) comparing conventional chemotherapy versus adding an additional high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) cycle with blood stem cell support. METHODS: A total of 314 patients were included in the clinical trial. QOL evaluations were available for 199 patients. QOL was assessed over a 1-year follow-up period, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30. The results were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Toxicity of HDC has a strong negative impact on patients' QOL during the treatment phase. This negative impact tended to last longer in the HDC group, as for most of the QLQ-C30 scales, the QOL scores of HDC patients tend to improve at a slower rate than that of patients receiving standard chemotherapy. In particular, physical functioning remains deteriorated 1 year after inclusion for HDC patients comparatively to conventional chemotherapy patients (85.99 vs. 76.65, P = 0.021), and the pain score was still higher in the HDC group at that time (28.32 vs. 15.97, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: HDC has a negative impact on QOL even after treatment phase. In the absence of an overall survival benefit of using HDC for high-risk breast cancer patients, QOL studies with a longer follow-up play an important role in informing the complex trade-off implied by HDC between higher toxicity, reduced risk of relapse, and QOL decrease after the active phase of treatment.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较随机临床试验(PEGASE 01)中包括的高危乳腺癌患者的生活质量(QOL),比较常规化疗与增加额外的大剂量化疗(HDC)周期与血液干细胞支持。方法:总共314例患者被纳入临床试验。对199位患者进行了QOL评价。使用欧洲研究与治疗癌症生活质量调查表C-30对欧洲生命质量进行了为期1年的随访评估。使用线性混合效应模型分析结果。结果:HDC的毒性在治疗阶段对患者的QOL有很大的负面影响。在大多数HDL组中,这种负面影响倾向于持续更长的时间,因为对于大多数QLQ-C30量表,HDC患者的QOL得分往往比接受标准化疗的患者缓慢。特别是,HDC患者入院后1年的身体机能仍然较传统化疗患者差(85.99比76.65,P = 0.021),那时HDC组的疼痛评分仍然更高(28.32比15.97, P = 0.004)。结论:即使在治疗阶段之后,HDC对QOL也有负面影响。在高危乳腺癌患者中缺乏使用HDC的整体生存益处的情况下,需要进行较长时间随访的QOL研究在告知HDC隐含的较高毒性,降低复发风险,治疗活跃期后,QOL和QOL降低。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号