...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Everolimus and Reduced-Exposure Cyclosporine in de novo Renal-Transplant Recipients: A Three-Year Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study.
【24h】

Everolimus and Reduced-Exposure Cyclosporine in de novo Renal-Transplant Recipients: A Three-Year Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study.

机译:从头肾移植受者中的依维莫司和暴露减少的环孢菌素:一项为期三年的II期随机,多中心,开放标签研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND.: Everolimus and cyclosporine (CsA) exhibit synergistic immunosuppressive activity when used in combination. We explored the use of everolimus with a CsA-sparing strategy in de novo renal-transplant recipients. METHODS.: A phase II, randomized, open-label 3-year study was performed in 111 patients to compare the efficacy and tolerability of everolimus (3 mg/day) in combination with basiliximab, steroids, and either full-dose Neoral (FDN) or reduced-dose Neoral (RDN) (CsA trough levels 125-250 ng/mL and 50-100 ng/mL, respectively). Efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection, death, graft loss, or loss to follow-up), safety, and renal function were evaluated at 6, 12, and 36 months. A protocol amendment allowed further reduction of CsA exposure after 12 months. RESULTS.: Efficacy failure was significantly higher in FDN than in the RDN group at 6 (15.1% vs. 3.4%; P=0.046), 12 (28.3% vs. 8.6%; P=0.012), and 36 (35.8% vs. 17.2%; P=0.032) months. Mean creatinine clearance was higher in the RDN group at 6 (59.7 mL/min vs. 51.1 mL/min; P=0.009), 12 (60.9 mL/min vs. 53.5 mL/min; P=0.007), and 36 (56.6 mL/min vs. 51.7 mL/min; P=0.436) months. Discontinuations and serious adverse events were more frequent in the FDN group. Reduction of CsA exposure for 6 months during the amendment improved renal function in the FDN group. CONCLUSIONS.: In de novo renal-transplant recipients, the regimen of everolimus plus RDN was well tolerated, with low efficacy failure and better renal function in comparison with everolimus plus FDN.
机译:背景:依维莫司和环孢素(CsA)组合使用时具有协同免疫抑制活性。我们探讨了依维莫司与CsA保留策略在从头肾移植受者中的使用。方法:对111位患者进行了II期,随机,开放标签的3年研究,比较了依维莫司(3 mg /天)联合巴利昔单抗,类固醇和全剂量神经性(FDN)的疗效和耐受性)或降低剂量的神经(RDN)(CsA谷水平分别为125-250 ng / mL和50-100 ng / mL)。在第6、12和36个月时评估疗效失败(活检证实的急性排斥反应,死亡,移植物丢失或失去随访),安全性和肾功能。协议修正案允许在12个月后进一步减少CsA暴露。结果:FDN的功效失败率显着高于RDN组,分别为6(15.1%比3.4%; P = 0.046),12(28.3%比8.6%; P = 0.012)和36(35.8%比35.8%)。 17.2%; P = 0.032)个月。 RDN组的平均肌酐清除率更高,分别为6(59.7 mL / min vs.51.1 mL / min; P = 0.009),12(60.9 mL / min vs.53.5 mL / min; P = 0.007)和36(56.6) mL / min与51.7 mL / min; P = 0.436)个月。 FDN组中止停药和严重不良事件更为常见。修正期间减少CsA暴露6个月改善了FDN组的肾功能。结论:从头进行肾移植的患者,依维莫司加RDN的方案耐受性好,与依维莫司加FDN相比,疗效较差,肾功能较好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号