...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?
【24h】

C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: is it worthwhile?

机译:维持性肾脏移植受者中的C2监测:是否值得?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

SUMMARY: Presently, there is little knowledge regarding cyclosporine (CsA) concentration at 2 hr post-dose (C2) monitoring in maintenance patients. This study evaluates the actual C2 range in stable renal transplant recipients (who underwent transplantation >12 months ago). In addition, we investigated whether underexposure or overexposure to CsA (assessed by C2) affects graft function (as measured by serum [S]-creatinine). All renal transplant recipients in Norway receiving CsA were asked to participate; 1,447 fulfilled the criteria. Valid C2 and CsA trough concentration (C0) measurements were performed in 1,032 renal transplant recipients (71%) monitored by C0. Target C0 level was 75 to 125 mumol/L. CsA levels were measured using a Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay method, and all analyses were performed in the same laboratory (overall mean [+/-standard deviation] CsA C0=112+/-31 mug/L, CsA C2=697+/-211 mug/L [range 81-1,580 mug/L], CsA dose [mg/day]=208+/-61, CsA dose [mg/kg/day]=2.8+/-1.1, and S-creatinine=141+/-58 mumol/L). A univariate analysis of variance showed that patients with C2 levels between 700 and 800 mug/L (n=203, S-creatinine=136+/-49 mumol/L) had significantly lower S-creatinine levels compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 mug/L (n=94, S-creatinine=152+/-56 mumol/L) (P<0.02). The same was true for patients with C2 levels less than 450 mug/L (n=95, S-creatinine 141+/-72 mumol/L) (P<0.05) when compared with patients with C2 levels greater than 950 mug/L. There was no significant difference in S-creatinine between patients in the low and intermediate C2 group; 666 patients had C0 levels in the therapeutic range (75-125 mumol/L). A linear regression showed a significant relation between S-creatinine and C2 for these patients (P=0.03). The corresponding relation between S-creatinine and C0 was nonsignificant (P=0.3). Monitoring of C2 in maintenance patients is a valuable tool to detect overexposure to CsA. Until results from prospective studies are available, we recommendC0 in the therapeutic range and reduction in CsA in overexposed patients, aiming at a C2 value between 700 and 800 mug/L.
机译:简介:目前,关于维持患者中给药后2小时(C2)监测环孢素(CsA)浓度的知识很少。这项研究评估了稳定的肾移植受者(接受了大于12个月的移植)的实际C2范围。此外,我们调查了暴露不足或过度暴露于CsA(由C2评估)是否会影响移植物功能(通过血清[S]-肌酐测量)。在挪威,所有接受CsA的肾移植受者均被要求参加。 1,447个符合标准。在由C0监测的1,032名肾移植受者(71%)中进行了有效的C2和CsA谷浓度(C0)测量。目标C0水平为75至125摩尔/升。使用克隆酶供体免疫测定法测量CsA水平,并且所有分析均在同一实验室中进行(总体平均[+/-标准偏差] CsA C0 = 112 +/- 31 mug / L,CsA C2 = 697 +/- 211杯/升[范围81-1,580杯/升],CsA剂量[mg / day] = 208 +/- 61,CsA剂量[mg / kg / day] = 2.8 +/- 1.1和S-肌酐= 141 +/- 58摩尔/升)。单因素方差分析显示,与C2水平较高的患者相比,C2水平在700至800杯/升之间(n = 203,S-肌酐= 136 +/- 49 mumol / L)的患者的S-肌酐水平显着降低。大于950杯/升(n = 94,S-肌酐= 152 +/- 56摩尔/升)(P <0.02)。与C2水平大于950杯/ L的患者相比,C2水平小于450杯/ L的患者(n = 95,S-肌酐为141 +/- 72 mumol / L)(P <0.05)也是如此。 。低和中度C2组患者的S-肌酐无显着差异。 666名患者的C0水平在治疗范围内(75-125 mumol / L)。线性回归显示这些患者的S-肌酐和C2之间存在显着相关性(P = 0.03)。 S-肌酐和C0之间的对应关系不显着(P = 0.3)。监测维持患者的C2是检测CsA过度暴露的有价值的工具。在获得前瞻性研究结果之前,我们建议在治疗范围内使用C0并降低过度暴露患者的CsA,以将C2值控制在700至800马克杯/升之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号