首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Medicine and International Health: TM and IH >Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities In 39 low-income countries
【24h】

Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities In 39 low-income countries

机译:39个低收入国家的公共和私人设施的使用和支出

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

objective To document the patterns of health service utilization and health payments at public and private facilities across countries.method We used data from the World Health Surveys from 39 low- and low-middle income countries to examine differences between public and private sectors. Utilization of outpatient and inpatient services, out-of-pocket payments (OOP) at public and private facilities, and transportation costs were compared.results Utilization and payments to public and private sectors differ widely. Public facilities dominated in most countries for both outpatient and inpatient services. But, whereas use of private facilities is more common among the rich, poor people also use them, to a considerable extent and in almost all the countries in the study. The majority of OOP were incurred at public providers for inpatient services. On average, this was not the case for outpatient services. Medicines accounted for the largest share of OOP for all services except inpatient services at private facilities, where consultation fees did. Transportation costs were considerable. Price competition is certainly not the only factor that guides choice of provider.conclusions The results support continued efforts by the governments to engage strategically with the private sector. However, they also highlight the importance of not generalizing conditions across countries. Governments may need to reconsider simplistic user-fee abolition strategies at public providers if they simply focus on consultation fees. Policies to make health services more accessible need to consider a comprehensive benefit package that includes a wider scope of costs related to care such as expenditures on medicines and transportation.
机译:目的记录各国公共和私人机构卫生服务利用和卫生支付的方式。方法我们使用了来自39个低收入和中低收入国家的《世界卫生调查》的数据来检验公共部门和私营部门之间的差异。比较了门诊和住院服务的使用,公共和私人设施的自付费用(OOP)以及运输成本。结果公共和私人部门的使用和支付方式差异很大。在大多数国家,门诊和住院服务均以公共设施为主导。但是,尽管在富人中使用私人设施更为普遍,但在研究的几乎所有国家中,穷人也在相当大的程度上使用私人设施。大部分OOP发生在公共服务提供者的住院服务上。平均而言,门诊服务并非如此。药品在所有服务的OOP中所占的比例最大,除了私人机构的住院服务(咨询费已收取)外。运输费用相当可观。价格竞争当然不是引导供应商选择的唯一因素。结论结果支持了政府为与私营部门进行战略性合作而继续做出的努力。但是,它们也强调了不对各国的条件进行概括的重要性。如果政府只关注咨询费,则可能需要重新考虑公共服务提供者的简单的用户收费取消策略。使医疗服务更容易获得的政策需要考虑全面的一揽子福利计划,其中包括与护理有关的更广泛的费用范围,例如药品和运输费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号