首页> 外文期刊>The oncologist >Health economic evaluation of treating anemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a study in Belgian hospitals.
【24h】

Health economic evaluation of treating anemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a study in Belgian hospitals.

机译:在接受化疗的癌症患者中治疗贫血的健康经济评估:比利时医院的一项研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used in chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) with the goal of improving quality of life and preventing RBC transfusions. This retrospective database study compared the three currently available ESAs, epoetin alfa (EPO-A), epoetin beta (EPO-B), and darbepoetin alfa (DARB), regarding costs and outcomes. METHODS: Data were obtained from a Belgian longitudinal database, including medical and financial data on cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and ESAs, submitted by 46 Belgian hospitals. Propensity score matching was applied to correct for selection bias. The main effectiveness parameter was defined as transfusion- and anemia-readmission-free survival (TA-free survival) at 3 months. Costs were analyzed taking the health care payer perspective. RESULTS: Including 1,584 EPO-A, 380 EPO-B, and 429 DARB propensity-matched patients, TA-free survival rates were similar for the three groups (DARB, 84.37%; EPO-A, 84.60%; EPO-B, 84.94%). Overall inpatient costs were euro 16,949 +/- euro 1,025, euro 19,472 +/- euro 901, and euro 19,295 +/- euro 1,048 for DARB, EPO-A, and EPO-B, respectively (DARB versus EPO-A, p < .0001 and DARB versus EPO-B, p = .008). Anemia-associated costs were euro 3,051 +/- euro 218 in the DARB group, compared with euro 3,995 +/- euro144 for EPO-A (p < .0001) and euro 3,752 +/- euro 229 for EPO-B (p = .0132). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first real-life matched retrospective study comparing ESAs with regard to both costs and effects. For similar patient profiles, the patients in the DARB group consumed the smallest amounts of ESAs, with similar clinical outcomes. These data therefore suggest a greater efficiency of DARB in the treatment of CIA.
机译:背景:促红细胞生成素(ESA)被用于化疗引起的贫血(CIA)中,目的是改善生活质量并防止红细胞输血。这项回顾性数据库研究比较了三种目前可用的ESA,即成本和结果,它们分别是epoetin alfa(EPO-A),epoetin beta(EPO-B)和darbepoetin alfa(DARB)。方法:数据来自比利时纵向数据库,包括比利时46家医院提交的接受化疗和ESA的癌症患者的医学和财务数据。倾向得分匹配用于校正选择偏向。主要有效性参数定义为3个月时无输血和无贫血再入院生存期(无TA生存期)。从医疗保健付款人的角度分析了成本。结果:包括1,584例EPO-A,380例EPO-B和429例DARB倾向匹配患者,三组的无TA生存率相似(DARB,84.37%; EPO-A,84.60%; EPO-B,84.94 %)。住院总费用分别为DARB,EPO-A和EPO-B分别为16,949 +/- 1,025欧元,19,472 +/- 901欧元和19,295 +/- 1,048欧元(DARB与EPO-A,p < .0001和DARB对EPO-B,p = .008)。 DARB组与贫血相关的费用为3,051 +/- 218欧元,而EPO-A的费用为3,995 +/- 144欧元(p <.0001),EPO-B的费用为3,752 +/- 229欧元(p = .0132)。结论:据我们所知,这是第一项在成本和效果方面比较ESA的现实生活中的回顾性研究。对于相似的患者情况,DARB组的患者消耗的ESA量最少,临床结果相似。因此,这些数据表明DARB在治疗CIA中具有更高的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号