...
首页> 外文期刊>Tumour biology : >Modified visor approach applied to total or subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction: avoidance of lip splitting and mandibulotomy and cutting off mental nerve.
【24h】

Modified visor approach applied to total or subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction: avoidance of lip splitting and mandibulotomy and cutting off mental nerve.

机译:改良的遮阳板方法适用于全部或次要的舌状切除术和重建术:避免唇裂和下颌骨切开术以及切断精神神经。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A lower lip-splitting incision has traditionally been performed with different types of mandibulotomy approaches for obtaining wide access to total or subtotal glossectomy. However, lip splitting can be associated with unfavorable aesthetic and function results. We describe our new modification of a traditional visor approach without lip splitting, mandibulotomy, and reserve mental nerve to avoid these morbidities and to compare aesthetic, functional, and patient subjective outcomes between the two access procedures.Of the patients undergoing total or subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with flaps, 99 were grouped according to a surgical access procedure performed (lip split and mandibulotomy [LSM] or modified visor approach [MVA]). Data on surgical morbidity and outcomes were compared. All the tumors were safely removed by means of our modified visor approach through the combined intraoral and transcervical routes with adequate resection margins. There were no troublesome difficulties in reconstruction of the surgical defects with various flaps. Recurrence rates, swallowing, chewing, and speech were similar for both groups. Rates of postoperative fistulae were 9.3 % (LSM) vs 0 % (MVA). There were significant differences between the two groups in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs (p?=?0.000) and for appearance domains (p?=?0.01). Avoiding lip splitting and mandibulotomy reduces patient morbidity and hospital stay and gets excellent aesthetic consequences; reserve mental nerve can avoid lower lip numbness after surgery. In our experience, the lower lip-splitting and mandibulotomy procedure for surgical exposure is unnecessary for both oncologic resection and reconstruction of tongue cancers.
机译:传统上已经使用不同类型的下颌骨切开术进行了下唇裂开切口,以广泛地进行全部或部分次的舌状切除术。然而,唇裂可能与不良的美学和功能结果相关。我们描述了我们对传统面罩方法的新修改,该方法没有唇裂,下颌骨切开术和保留精神神经,从而避免了这些并发症的发生,并比较了两种手术方法之间的美学,功能和患者主观结果。用皮瓣重建术,根据手术入路方法(唇裂和下颌骨切开术[LSM]或改良面罩入路[MVA])将99例分组。比较了手术发病率和结果的数据。通过改良的面罩方法,通过口内和子宫颈联合手术,并有足够的切除余量,安全地切除了所有肿瘤。用各种皮瓣重建手术缺损没有麻烦的困难。两组的复发率,吞咽,咀嚼和言语相似。术后瘘管发生率为9.3%(LSM)对0%(MVA)。两组在颞下颌关节(TMJ)体征(p?=?0.000)和外观区域(p?=?0.01)之间存在显着差异。避免唇裂和下颌切开术可减少患者的发病率和住院时间,并获得出色的美学效果;保留精神神经可避免手术后下唇麻木。根据我们的经验,对于肿瘤切除和舌癌的重建,都不需要采用下唇裂和下颌切开术进行手术暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号