...
首页> 外文期刊>X-Ray Spectrometry: An International Journal >Betterment in EDXRF analytical results for compositional characterization of mixed uranium thorium oxide samples with bead specimens compared with pressed pellet specimens
【24h】

Betterment in EDXRF analytical results for compositional characterization of mixed uranium thorium oxide samples with bead specimens compared with pressed pellet specimens

机译:与混合压片样品相比,EDXRF分析结果的改进可更好地表征带有珠子样品的混合铀氧化th样品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A comparative study on the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence analytical results of uranium determinations, in uranium and uranium-thorium mixed oxides, using specimens in the form of fused beads and pressed pellets, has been made. It was observed that in case of fusion bead specimens, the intensity of the analyte lines was approximately 1.6 times of that observed in pellet specimens under identical instrumental conditions. In case of uranium oxide samples, the analytical results with bead specimens were slightly better compared with the pellet specimens. However, in case of the uranium-thorium oxide mixtures, the average precision obtained with bead specimen was significantly better (1%, 1s) in comparison with that achieved using pellet specimens (7%, 1s). This difference may be due to the hardness of thorium oxide compared with uranium oxide, which affects the homogeneity of the pellet specimens prepared. In fusion bead method of sample preparation, even highly refractory material like ThO2 forms uniform glass beads. Addition of internal standard further improves the analytical results, with reduction in the percent deviation of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence results from the expected values to 3% from 7% compared with that obtained using without internal standard. The fusion bead method of sample preparation will be very useful for characterization of sintered (U,Th)O-2 pellets, which are highly refractory and difficult to dissolve. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:进行了铀和铀-or混合氧化物中铀的能量色散X射线荧光分析结果的比较研究,使用了熔融小珠和压制小球形式的样品。观察到,在熔融珠子样品的情况下,在相同的仪器条件下,分析物谱线的强度约为在丸粒样品中观察到的强度的1.6倍。如果是氧化铀样品,则珠状样品的分析结果要比粒状样品好。但是,在使用铀-氧化oxide混合物的情况下,与使用小球样品(7%,1s)相比,使用珠子样品获得的平均精度显着提高(1%,1s)。这种差异可能是由于氧化or与氧化铀相比的硬度,这会影响所制备颗粒样品的均匀性。在样品制备的熔融珠方法中,即使是高耐火材料,如ThO2,也会形成均匀的玻璃珠。内标的添加进一步改善了分析结果,与不使用内标的情况相比,能量分散X射线荧光结果的偏离百分比从预期值从7%降低到了7%。样品制备的融合珠方法对于表征高度难熔且难以溶解的烧结(U,Th)O-2颗粒非常有用。版权所有(c)2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号