首页> 外文期刊>Tumori. >Are international guidelines for the prescription of adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer followed in clinical practice? Results of a population-based study on 1547 patients.
【24h】

Are international guidelines for the prescription of adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer followed in clinical practice? Results of a population-based study on 1547 patients.

机译:临床实践中是否遵循有关早期乳腺癌辅助治疗处方的国际指南?对1547位患者进行的基于人群的研究结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The results of several randomized trials and meta-analyses have been reported on adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer and treatment guidelines have been defined accordingly, but detailed data are lacking on the appropriateness of treatment prescription in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study to monitor the prescription, delivery and effectiveness of radiotherapy following conservative surgery for early breast cancer; 1610 patients treated with postoperative radiation to the breast in 1997 were entered by 12 centers in Lombardy, Italy. Here we report the results of a secondary analysis focused on the prescription of medical adjuvant treatment (1547 eligible patients). RESULTS: Chemotherapy only was prescribed to 526 patients (33%), hormonal therapy only to 539 (33%), and both treatments to 85 patients (5%); 460 women (29%) received no medical adjuvant treatment. We compared the collected data with guidelines defined in 1995 by the St Gallen Consensus Conference. Undertreatment was most frequent in node-negative patients at intermediate/high risk, no treatment (instead of tamoxifen or chemotherapy) being prescribed in 21-45% of cases. Node-negative patients at low risk, on the other hand, were overtreated with tamoxifen in 31% of cases. In node-positive, premenopausal women compliance with guidelines was far better, with a 91-96% rate of chemotherapy prescription. In node-positive, postmenopausal, estrogen receptor-positive patients chemotherapy was unduly prescribed in as many as 56% of cases. Comparison of clinical practice with the next version of the guidelines (1998) showed a somewhat better compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of official and authoritative guidelines, adjuvant treatment prescription for early breast cancer in Lombardy in 1997 was suboptimal, especially in well-defined subgroups of patients.
机译:目的和背景:已经报道了一些关于早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的随机试验和荟萃分析的结果,并据此确定了治疗指南,但是缺乏关于治疗处方在临床实践中的适用性的详细数据。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性,观察性,多中心研究,以监测早期乳腺癌保守手术后放疗的处方,递送和效果。 1997年,意大利伦巴第的12个中心接受了1610例接受术后乳房放射治疗的患者。在这里,我们报告了针对辅助药物治疗处方的二次分析结果(1547名合格患者)。结果:仅对526名患者(33%)开了化学疗法,仅对539名患者(33%)开了激素疗法,对85名患者(5%)开了两种疗法。 460名女性(29%)没有接受医疗辅助治疗。我们将收集的数据与1995年圣加仑共识会议定义的指南进行了比较。在中/高风险的淋巴结阴性患者中,治疗不足最常见,在21-45%的病例中未进行任何治疗(代替他莫昔芬或化学疗法)。另一方面,低风险的淋巴结阴性患者中有31%的患者接受了他莫昔芬的过度治疗。在淋巴结阳性患者中,绝经前妇女对指南的依从性要好得多,化疗处方的使用率为91-96%。在结节阳性,绝经后,雌激素受体阳性的患者中,有多达56%的患者过度使用了化学疗法。将临床实践与下一版指南(1998年)进行比较显示出更好的依从性。结论:尽管有官方和权威指南,1997年伦巴第早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗处方仍不理想,尤其是在明确定义的患者亚组中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号