...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Analysis of sample-to-cutoff ratios on chemiluminescent immunoassays used for blood donor screening highlights the need for serologic confirmatory testing.
【24h】

Analysis of sample-to-cutoff ratios on chemiluminescent immunoassays used for blood donor screening highlights the need for serologic confirmatory testing.

机译:在用于献血者筛查的化学发光免疫分析中,样品与截止值的比率分析表明需要进行血清学确认性检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: High sample-to-cutoff (s/co) ratios on hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) screening immunoassays (IAs) are indicative of confirmed-positive results and, according to some reports, can be used to determine anti-HCV status without the need for confirmatory testing. The purpose of this study was to determine whether s/co ratios on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to human immunodeficiency virus Types 1 and 2 (anti-HIV-1/2), anti-HCV, and antibody to human T-lymphotropic virus Types I and II (anti-HTLV-I/II) chemiluminescent immunoassays (ChLIAs) can be used to discriminate between biologic false-reactive (BFR) and confirmed-positive results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a blood donor population the s/co ratio distributions for BFR and confirmed-positive results were compared for the Abbott PRISM HBsAg, HIV O Plus, HCV, and HTLV-I/II ChLIAs to determine the extent of overlap between the two distributions for each assay. RESULTS: The s/co ratio distributions for BFR and confirmed results overlapped in the range of 10.00 to 60.00, 1.00 to 6.00, 3.00 to 15.00, and 1.00 to 100.00 for the PRISM HIV O Plus, HCV, HTLV-I/II, and HBsAg assays, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although high s/co ratios were predictive of confirmed-positive results in all four assays, a number of confirmed-positive samples gave low values while some biologic false-positive samples showed high values. As the s/co ratio distributions for BFR and confirmed-positive results overlapped for all four PRISM assays, this study highlights the importance of serologic confirmatory testing and the need for caution when using screening IA results to assign a final donor status.
机译:背景:丙型肝炎病毒抗体(anti-HCV)筛查免疫测定(IAs)的高样品/截止(s / co)比表明已确认阳性结果,根据一些报告,可用于确定抗-HCV HCV状态,无需确认测试。这项研究的目的是确定乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg),1型和2型人类免疫缺陷病毒的抗体(抗HIV-1 / 2),抗HCV以及抗人类T抗体的s / co比I型和II型嗜淋巴细胞病毒(抗HTLV-I / II)化学发光免疫测定(ChLIAs)可用于区分生物学假反应(BFR)和确证的阳性结果。研究设计和方法:在献血者群体中,比较了Abbott PRISM HBsAg,HIV O Plus,HCV和HTLV-I / II ChLIA的BFR的s / co比分布和确认的阳性结果,以确定重叠的程度每个分析的两个分布之间。结果:PRISM HIV O Plus,HCV,HTLV-I / II和BFR的s / co比分布和已确认的结果在10.00至60.00、1.00至6.00、3.00至15.00和1.00至100.00的范围内重叠分别进行HBsAg分析。结论:尽管在所有四种测定中高的s / co比都可预测确认的阳性结果,但许多确认的阳性样品的数值较低,而一些生物学上的假阳性样品的数值较高。由于所有四种PRISM测定的BFR的s / co比分布和确诊的阳性结果均重叠,因此本研究强调了血清学确证试验的重要性,以及在使用筛查IA结果确定最终供体状态时需要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号