...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Erythrocyte-magnetized technology: an original and innovative method for blood group serology.
【24h】

Erythrocyte-magnetized technology: an original and innovative method for blood group serology.

机译:红细胞磁化技术:一种创新的血型血清学方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Erythrocyte-magnetized technology (EMT) is a new fully automated method for ABO-RH-K phenotyping and antibody detection. The magnetization of red cells avoids centrifugation and washing phases. This report describes the results of an evaluation of this new technology on its specific automated system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: ABO-RH-K phenotyping was compared between EMT and a semiautomated routine method (liquid microplate for ABO-D and microcolumn system for RH-K) on 311 patients' samples. The overall performance of the new method was further assessed in daily routine on a total of 11,022 samples during 3 months in two different laboratories. Antibody detection was evaluated on 624 consecutive patients' samples and on 118 frozen samples containing specific antibodies in comparison with commercial microcolumn systems. RESULTS: Eight of 311 ABO-RH-K tests (2.6%) were not interpreted by EMT. Seven of them were weak antigen or reverse grouping reactions showing a negative result with the routine method. On a 3-month follow-up, 216 of 11,022 tests (1.96%) were not interpreted by the system, 75 percent of them being due to weak or mixed-field reactions. EMT was better in detecting ABO-D mixed-field reaction than routine microplate method. Detection of clinically significant antibodies was similar between EMT and microcolumn. In contrast, EMT detected a markedly lower rate of presumed nonsignificant antibodies. The system presents an overall high reliability. CONCLUSION: EMT is tailored to meet the needs of the transfusion service and represents an important advance in the field of immunohematology.
机译:背景:红细胞磁化技术(EMT)是一种用于ABO-RH-K表型鉴定和抗体检测的新型全自动方法。红细胞的磁化避免了离心和洗涤阶段。本报告描述了对该新技术对其特定自动化系统的评估结果。研究设计和方法:对311例患者的EMT与半自动常规方法(ABO-D的液体微孔板和RH-K的微柱系统)之间的ABO-RH-K表型进行了比较。在两个不同的实验室中,在3个月的时间里,对日常使用的新方法的总体性能进行了进一步评估,共评估了11,022个样品。与商用微柱系统相比,对624例连续患者的样品和118例含有特异性抗体的冷冻样品进行了抗体检测。结果:311 ABO-RH-K测试中有八项(2.6%)没有被EMT解释。其中七个是弱抗原或反向分组反应,常规方法显示阴性结果。在为期3个月的随访中,系统未解释11,022项测试中的216项(1.96%),其中75%是由于微弱或混合场反应引起的。 EMT在检测ABO-D混合场反应方面比常规微孔板法更好。在EMT和微柱之间,具有临床意义的抗体的检测方法相似。相比之下,EMT检测到的估计无意义抗体的比率显着降低。该系统具有整体高可靠性。结论:EMT是为满足输血服务的需求而量身定制的,代表了免疫血液学领域的重要进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号