首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell yield from standard chemotherapy used in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies and high-dose cyclophosphamide: a retrospective review of 141 patients.
【24h】

Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell yield from standard chemotherapy used in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies and high-dose cyclophosphamide: a retrospective review of 141 patients.

机译:标准疗法用于淋巴恶性肿瘤和大剂量环磷酰胺治疗的外周血祖细胞产量的比较:回顾性回顾141例患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are often collected after mobilization with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) combined with growth factors. HDC may not be needed for PBPC mobilization, and patients with lymphoid malignancies can be harvested with treatment regimens of chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 141 patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma whose PBPCs were harvested after chemotherapy. The PBPC yield and time to mobilization was compared between patients who received HDC (n = 51) and other chemotherapy regimens (n = 90) including high-dose cyclophosphamide and etoposide (HDC plus VP-16; n = 41), CHOP, ESHAP, ABVD, VAD, and others (n = 49). A multiple linear regression model and proportional hazards model determined factors influencing yield and time to mobilization, respectively. RESULTS: The difference in mean yield between HDC and all non-HDC regimens was significant, with HDC plus VP-16 resulting in the highest yields. The proportion of patients achieving a CD34 count in excess of 5 x 10(6) per kg did not differ significantly between the regimens. In a multiple linear regression model, HDC plus VP-16 resulted in a higher PBPC yield than HDC but all other regimens did not. In addition, patients exposed to more than one prior chemotherapy regimen had lower yield regardless of the mobilization regimen. The mean number of days to mobilization with HDC was 10.2 days, 17.1 days for HDC plus VP-16, and 14.2 days for all other regimens. The timing of mobilization was influenced by the chemotherapy used and the number of prior regimens in a proportional hazards model. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a higher mean yield of PBPCs with HDC plus VP-16 but no difference in yield between non-HDC plus VP-16 regimens used for first-line or relapse therapy and HDC, suggesting that HDC may be an unnecessary additional therapy.
机译:背景:外周血祖细胞(PBPC)通常在动员大剂量环磷酰胺(HDC)和生长因子后动员。 PBPC动员可能不需要HDC,并且可以通过化学疗法治疗患有淋巴恶性肿瘤的患者。研究设计和方法:回顾性分析了141例淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者,其化疗后收集了PBPC。比较接受HDC(n = 51)和其他化疗方案(n = 90),包括大剂量环磷酰胺和依托泊苷(HDC加VP-16; n = 41),CHOP,ESHAP的患者的PBPC产量和动员时间,ABVD,VAD等(n = 49)。多元线性回归模型和比例风险模型分别确定了影响产量和动员时间的因素。结果:HDC和所有非HDC方案之间的平均产量差异显着,其中HDC加VP-16导致最高产量。在两种方案之间,获得CD34计数超过5 x 10(6)/ kg的患者比例没有明显差异。在多元线性回归模型中,HDC加VP-16导致PBPC产量高于HDC,但其他所有方案均未达到。此外,无论动员方案如何,暴露于一种以上先前化疗方案的患者的收率均较低。 HDC动员的平均天数为10.2天,HDC加VP-16的平均为17.1天,其他所有方案的平均为14.2天。动员时间受所用化学疗法和成比例危险模型中现有方案数量的影响。结论:这些结果表明,HDC加VP-16的PBPC的平均产率较高,但用于一线或复发治疗的非HDC加VP-16方案与HDC的产率无差异,这表明HDC可能是不必要的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号