...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Use of IgM monoclonal reagents licensed for tube tests in column agglutination technology.
【24h】

Use of IgM monoclonal reagents licensed for tube tests in column agglutination technology.

机译:在色谱柱凝集技术中使用许可用于试管测试的IgM单克隆试剂。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Red cell (RBC) phenotyping using column agglutination technology (CAT) is currently limited by the reagents formulated in the system. To overcome this limitation, it was investigated whether monoclonal IgM reagents licensed for use with tube tests produced valid results with CAT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Commercial CAT, does not contain antisera, was used to evaluate Procedures A (40 microL of reagent and 10 microL of 4% RBCs) and B (50 microL of reagent and 50 microL of 0.8% RBCs) with or without incubation at room temperature. In Study 1, reagents were tested to determine whether potentiators inhibit the passage of antigen-negative RBCs through the column. In Study 2, CAT sensitivity was measured by the use of potency titrations to define a procedure for each reagent that matched or exceeded that of the tube method. In Study 3, the specificity of each reagent was determined in parallel with the CAT and tube tests. Typing of 1644 samples was performed. RESULTS: Study 1: Free passage was obtained with all reagents. Study 2: Immediate-spin methods using CAT produced the same results as the tube method. Study 3: With 8048 comparisons made, discrepant results were found in 32 transfused patients and in 6 cord blood samples, mainly with Lewis reagents. With comparison of CAT and the standard tube method, complete agreement was obtained with Kell reagents, 99.9-percent agreement with Kidd reagents, and 98.9-percent and 99.4-percent agreement with Lewis reagents. CONCLUSION: Most examined reagents seem suitable for use with CAT.
机译:背景:使用柱凝集技术(CAT)的红细胞(RBC)表型目前受到系统中配制的试剂的限制。为了克服这一限制,研究了许可用于试管测试的单克隆IgM试剂在CAT中是否产生有效的结果。研究设计和方法:不包含抗血清的商业CAT用于评估程序A(40微升试剂和10微升4%红细胞)和B(50微升试剂和50微升0.8%红细胞)的有无在室温下孵育。在研究1中,测试了试剂以确定增效剂是否抑制抗原阴性RBC通过色谱柱。在研究2中,通过使用效价滴定来测量CAT灵敏度,以定义每种试剂的匹配或超出试管法的程序。在研究3中,与CAT和试管测试同时确定每种试剂的特异性。键入1644个样本。结果:研究1:所有试剂均获得自由通过。研究2:使用CAT的立即旋转方法产生的结果与试管法相同。研究3:进行8048次比较后,在32例输血患者和6例脐血样本中发现了不同的结果,主要是使用Lewis试剂。通过比较CAT和标准试管法,与Kell试剂的完全吻合,与Kidd试剂的99.9%吻合,与Lewis试剂的98.9%和99.4%吻合。结论:大多数检查过的试剂似乎适用于CAT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号