...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Comparison of two leukapheresis programs for computerized collection of blood progenitor cells on a new cell separator.
【24h】

Comparison of two leukapheresis programs for computerized collection of blood progenitor cells on a new cell separator.

机译:比较两种在新细胞分离器上计算机采集血液祖细胞的白细胞去除程序。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) can be collected on various cell separators. Two leukapheresis programs (LP-MNC and LP-PBSC-Lym) were evaluated for computerized collection of PBPCs on a new cell separator. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Leukapheresis assisted by the LP-MNC or LP-PBSC-Lym software was performed for the harvesting of PBPCs in 52 oncology patients after chemotherapy plus G-CSF treatment and in 18 healthy subjects after G-CSF mobilization alone. RESULTS: A total of 38 components from 33 donors via LP-MNC and 43 components from 37 donors via LP-PBSC-Lym were collected with a median of one (range, one to two) standard-volume leukapheresis procedures (9.2-13.3 L) per donor. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning median counts of WBCs, CD34+ cells, CD34+ cell yields per harvest, and CD34+ cell yields of cumulative harvests. The blood cell counts after leukapheresis revealed that the LP-MNC resulted in significantly higher platelet loss than LP-PBSC-Lym (p = 0.024): 35.9 percent (range, 19.2%-66.1%) versus 29.7 percent (11.6%-52.3%). Regarding the CD34+ cell collection efficiency, the LP-MNC program was significantly better than the LP-PBSC-Lym program (p < 0.001): 77.5 percent (range, 35.5%-98.9%) versus 58.3 percent (range, 20.4%-98.9%). However, concentrates collected by the LP-PBSC-Lym program had significantly higher percentages of MNCs (p < 0.001) and CD34+ cells (p = 0.028) than harvests with the LP-MNC program: 90 percent (range, 69%-99%) versus 70 percent (range, 35%-98%) and 1.2 percent (range, 0.2%-7.3%) versus 0.7 percent (range, 0.2%-6.0%), respectively. No leukapheresis-related serious adverse events were seen, and time for hematopoietic engraftment was equivalent to data published in the literature. CONCLUSION: The LP-MNC program shows a significantly better CD34+ cell collection efficiency than the LP-PBSC-Lym program. However, collections with the LP-MNC program result in PBPC components with a lower MNC and CD34+ cell concentrations and a higher apheresis-related loss of patient's platelets.
机译:背景:外周血祖细胞(PBPC)可以收集在各种细胞分离器上。评估了两个白细胞分离程序(LP-MNC和LP-PBSC-Lym),用于在新的细胞分离器上以计算机方式收集PBPC。研究设计和方法:在LP + MNC或LP-PBSC-Lym软件的辅助下进行白细胞分离术,以收集52例化疗加G-CSF治疗的肿瘤患者和18例仅G-CSF动员的健康受试者的PBPC。结果:总共收集了来自LP-MNC的33个供体的38个组分和通过LP-PBSC-Lym的37个供体的43个组分,中位数为标准体积白细胞分离术(9.2-13.3 L)(范围为一到两个) )每位捐赠者。两组之间的白细胞,CD34 +细胞,单次收获的CD34 +细胞产量和累计收获的CD34 +细胞产量的中位数无明显差异。白细胞去除后的血细胞计数显示LP-MNC导致的血小板损失明显高于LP-PBSC-Lym(p = 0.024):35.9%(范围19.2%-66.1%)对29.7%(11.6%-52.3%) )。关于CD34 +细胞收集效率,LP-MNC程序明显优于LP-PBSC-Lym程序(p <0.001):77.5%(范围35.5%-98.9%)对58.3%(范围20.4%-98.9) %)。但是,与LP-MNC计划收获相比,LP-PBSC-Lym计划收集的浓缩物的MNC百分比(p <0.001)和CD34 +细胞(p = 0.028)明显更高:90%(范围69%-99% )分别为70%(范围35%-98%)和1.2%(范围0.2%-7.3%)对0.7%(范围0.2%-6.0%)。没有观察到与白细胞分离术相关的严重不良事件,造血移植的时间与文献中公布的数据相当。结论:LP-MNC程序显示出比LP-PBSC-Lym程序明显更好的CD34 +细胞收集效率。但是,使用LP-MNC程序进行收集会导致PBPC组件具有较低的MNC和CD34 +细胞浓度,以及与血液分离相关的患者血小板增多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号