【24h】

Pathogen-reduction systems for blood components: the current position and future trends.

机译:血液成分的病原体减少系统:当前位置和未来趋势。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current multi-layered interventional approaches to blood safety have dramatically reduced the risk of viral contamination of blood components. Nowadays most of the residual transfusion transmitted infections (TTI) occur as the result of the interval between the time the donor is infected and the moment at which tests are capable of detecting the agent, the so called "window period" which has been considerably reduced by the increased sensitivity of nucleic acid testing (NAT). However, the residual risk of bacterial contamination and the unexpected appearance of some other emerging pathogens, almost every five years, are still of major concern to the public, politicians, regulatory agencies and place immense pressures on the organisations responsible for the provision of safe blood and its components. In view of these bleak scenarios, the use of human blood as a raw biological source is inherently unsafe, and screening/testing alone cannot exclude all the potential human pathogens; hence we need to put in place some sort of safer alternatives and/or additional preventative safety measures. Recently, several substitutes (alternatives) to virtual blood components have been developed and tried. Moreover, various mechanical methods such as cell washing and leukofiltration have been implemented as additional preventative safety measures but with limited success in abrogating the risk of transfusion transmitted cell-associated agents. The most promising approaches, so far, are methods that target pathogen nucleic acids (Methylene blue; Psolaren and Riboflavin UV light treatment). These procedures have undergone considerable in vitro studies to ensure their extremely high safety margins in terms of toxicity to the cells or to the recipients. In essence, while the technology of targeting nucleic acid to stop viral proliferation is common to the above three strategies, in practice these procedures differ in terms of operational, physicochemical and biological characteristics; including the potential impacts of their metabolites and photo-adducts; their effects on the spectrum of pathogens affected and the log reductions in culture infective studies. Accordingly, any strategy that involves addition of an extraneous agent or physicochemical manipulation of blood must balance the benefits of pathogen reduction against the loss or alteration to the cells and plasma functional integrity, short and long term toxicity to the cells and to the recipients, as well as the risk to the personnel involved and the community at large. Moreover, it must be noted that each method will have a different profile of adverse reactions and may differ in terms of the risk to particularly vulnerable groups of patients, requiring in depth clinical trials, while taking into consideration the cost benefit of the final process. Newer diagnostic procedures must be in place to establish the storage stability of products that have undergone pathogen inactivation, in particular tests reflecting the release of platelet-derived cytokines, cellular apoptosis or microvesiculation and their role in immunosupressiveness. This overview aims to provide an update on the continual improvements in blood component safety, in particular using methods that target pathogen nucleic acid. Emphasis is placed on methylene blue light treatment (MBLT) and Intercept or Mirasol PRT systems for platelets and plasma. The status of pathogen reduction of whole blood and red cells is also highlighted, though the progress in this area has been virtually stopped after the finding of antibody development in the clinical trial.
机译:当前血液安全的多层干预方法已大大降低了血液成分被病毒污染的风险。如今,大多数残留输血传播感染(TTI)的发生是由于捐赠者被感染的时间与测试能够检测到病原体的时间之间的时间间隔,所谓的“窗口期”已大大减少通过提高核酸测试(NAT)的敏感性。然而,几乎每五年,细菌污染的残留风险和一些其他新兴病原体的意外出现仍然是公众,政客,监管机构的主要关切,并给负责提供安全血液的组织施加了巨大压力。及其组件。鉴于这些惨淡的情况,使用人类血液作为原始生物来源本质上是不安全的,仅进行筛查/检测并不能排除所有潜在的人类病原体。因此,我们需要采取某种更安全的替代方法和/或其他预防性安全措施。最近,已经开发并尝试了几种虚拟血液成分的替代品(替代品)。而且,已经采取了各种机械方法,例如细胞洗涤和白细胞过滤作为附加的预防性安全措施,但是在消除输血传播的细胞相关药剂的风险方面取得了有限的成功。迄今为止,最有前途的方法是靶向病原体核酸的方法(亚甲基蓝; Psolaren和核黄素UV光处理)。这些程序已经进行了大量的体外研究,以确保它们对细胞或受体的毒性具有极高的安全性。从本质上讲,尽管靶向核酸以终止病毒增殖的技术是上述三种策略所共有的,但实际上,这些程序在操作,物理化学和生物学特性方面有所不同;包括其代谢产物和光加合物的潜在影响;它们对受影响病原体谱的影响以及培养感染研究中对数减少。因此,任何涉及添加外源性试剂或对血液进行物理化学处理的策略都必须在减少病原体的益处与细胞的丧失或改变以及血浆功能完整性,对细胞和受体的短期和长期毒性之间取得平衡。以及相关人员和整个社区的风险。此外,必须注意的是,每种方法的不良反应情况都不同,并且考虑到最终过程的成本效益,需要特别进行临床试验的患者尤其是弱势群体的风险有所不同。必须建立更新的诊断程序来建立已灭活病原体的产品的储存稳定性,特别是反映血小板源性细胞因子释放,细胞凋亡或微囊泡及其在免疫抑制中作用的测试。本概述旨在提供有关血液成分安全性持续改进的最新信息,尤其是使用针对病原体核酸的方法。重点放在用于血小板和血浆的亚甲基蓝光治疗(MBLT)和Intercept或Mirasol PRT系统上。尽管在临床试验中发现了抗体的发展后,该领域的进展实际上已经停止,但全血和红细胞的病原体减少的状况也得到了强调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号