...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Alloimmunization in preterm infants after repeated transfusions of WBC-reduced RBCs from the same donor.
【24h】

Alloimmunization in preterm infants after repeated transfusions of WBC-reduced RBCs from the same donor.

机译:重复输注来自同一供体的WBC减少的RBC后,对早产婴儿进行同种免疫。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are among the most heavily transfused of patient groups, yet multiply transfused infants only rarely produce alloantibodies against RBC or WBC antigens. It is not known whether rates of alloimmunization might be increased by repeated exposure to RBCs and WBCs from the same donor, as in limited-donor-exposure programs, or whether infants might benefit from WBC-reduced RBC components as a means of diminishing the risk of possible alloimmunization. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Preterm infants (birth weight 0.6-1.3 kg) received prestorage WBC-reduced RBCs from dedicated donors, collected in AS-3 as a means of limiting donor exposures. Blood samples were collected serially from infants shortly after birth until either discharge or age 6 months and were studied for RBC and WBC antibodies-the latter with reactivity against either HLA class I or neutrophil-specific antigens. RESULTS: Thirty preterm infants received 139 transfusions (mean, 4.6; median, 4 transfusions per infant), with 81 percent of transfusions obtained from one donor per infant. Eighty-four blood samples (mean, 2.7/infant) were studied, and no infant produced RBC antibodies. Twenty-seven percent of infants exhibited WBC antibodies, but only 13 percent actually produced WBC antibodies (passive maternal antibody excluded). Of the WBC antibodies produced by infants, three were against HLA class I and one was against neutrophil-specific antigens; none were linked to adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Because infants only rarely produce RBC antibodies, no changes in blood banking practices are necessary for limited-donor-exposure programs. Although the production of WBC antibodies by infants occurs, it seems to be uncommon; thus, the possible benefits, if any, of WBC reduction are uncertain, and further study is required before changes in practice can be justified.
机译:背景:早产婴儿是患者组中输血最严重的人群,而多次输血的婴儿很少会产生针对RBC或WBC抗原的同种抗体。尚不知道是否可以通过重复接触同一供体的RBC和WBC来提高同种免疫的速度,如在有限的供体暴露方案中,还是婴儿可以从WBC减少的RBC成分中受益,以降低风险可能的同种免疫。研究设计和方法:早产儿(出生体重0.6-1.3千克)从献血者那里接受了WBC减少的储存红细胞,这些物质收集在AS-3中,以限制献血者的暴露。在出生后不久直至出院或6个月大时从婴儿中连续采集血样,并研究其RBC和WBC抗体-后者对HLA I类或嗜中性粒细胞特异性抗原具有反应性。结果:30例早产儿接受了139次输血(平均4.6;中位数,每名婴儿4次输血),其中81%的输血是从每个婴儿的一位供体获得的。研究了84个血液样本(平均为2.7 /婴儿),没有婴儿产生RBC抗体。 27%的婴儿表现出WBC抗体,但只有13%的人实际产生WBC抗体(不包括被动母体抗体)。婴儿产生的WBC抗体中,有3种针对I类HLA,一种针对中性粒细胞特异性抗原。没有一个与副作用有关。结论:由于婴儿仅很少产生RBC抗体,因此对于有限的供体暴露计划,无需改变血库的做法。尽管婴儿会产生WBC抗体,但这似乎并不常见。因此,减少白细胞的可能益处(如果有的话)是不确定的,需要进一步研究以证明实践的改变是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号