【24h】

Fresh-frozen plasma, pathogen-reduced single-donor plasma or bio-pharmaceutical plasma?

机译:新鲜冷冻血浆,减少病原体的单供体血浆或生物制药血浆?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three types of therapeutic plasma are available that differ in their manufacturing processes, composition, clinical efficacy, and side effects. Quarantine-stored, not pathogen-reduced fresh-frozen plasma (QFFP) is prepared from single whole blood or plasma donations. The manufacture of pathogen-reduced single-donor plasmas such as methylene blue-light treated (MLP) or amotosalen-ultraviolet light treated plasma (ALP) involves the addition of a chemical followed by irradiation and subsequent removal of the chemical. Both plasma types show substantial fluctuation of clotting factor and inhibitor levels according to interindividual variations, and both carry the risk of inducing transfusion-associated lung injury (TRALI). Photo-oxidation in pathogen-reduced single-donor plasmas reduces clottable fibrinogen and other clotting factors markedly, and there is a lack of clear evidence showing whether this is harmful or not. MLP also appears to be less effective clinically than QFFP. Like clotting factor or inhibitor concentrates, solvent/detergent-treated plasmas (SDP) are bio-pharmaceutical preparations derived from large plasma pools, and variations in plasma protein levels from batch-to-batch are for that reason low. The SD manufacturing process inevitably involves a considerable reduction of plasmin inhibitor (PI), and moderate reduction of all other clotting factors and inhibitors in the final plasma bags. Clinical studies and broad clinical use have however shown that this does not significantly reduce clinical efficacy or increase adverse events. SDPs obviously do not induce TRALI and the risk of allergic reactions is significantly lower than for QFFP. Common to all three plasma types is that the time between donation and freezing the plasma, and whether plasma from whole blood or apheresis plasma is used as starting material, are decisive determinants for the clotting factor and inhibitor potencies in the final bags. Plasma frozen 3-6h after donation, and apheresis plasma, contain markedly greater amounts of clotting factors and inhibitors than plasma frozen 15-24h after collection or plasma from whole blood. Lyophilisation and the pooling of single-donor plasma units with ABO blood group in suitable proportions (Uniplas) facilitate SDP handling and logistics without loss of clinical efficacy. SDP is obviously at least as cost-effective as QFFP if non-infectious adverse events including TRALI are taken into account, at least in younger patients and patients with good prognosis.
机译:可获得三种类型的治疗性血浆,它们的制造工艺,组成,临床功效和副作用不同。隔离保存的,未减少病原体的新鲜冷冻血浆(QFFP)是从单次全血或血浆捐赠中制备的。减少病原体的单供体血浆的生产,例如亚甲基蓝光处理(MLP)或AMOTOSALEN-紫外线处理的血浆(ALP),需要添加化学物质,然后进行辐照并随后除去化学物质。两种血浆均显示出凝血因子和抑制剂水平的巨大波动,这取决于个体之间的差异,并且都具有诱发输血相关性肺损伤(TRALI)的风险。减少病原体的单供体血浆中的光氧化作用显着降低了可凝结的纤维蛋白原和其他凝结因子,并且缺乏明确的证据表明这是否有害。 MLP在临床上似乎还不如QFFP有效。像凝血因子或抑制剂浓缩物一样,溶剂/去污剂处理的血浆(SDP)是源自大型血浆库的生物药物制剂,因此批次之间血浆蛋白水平的变化较低。 SD的制造过程不可避免地涉及到纤溶酶抑制剂(PI)的显着降低,以及最终血浆袋中所有其他凝血因子和抑制剂的适度降低。然而,临床研究和广泛的临床使用表明,这不会显着降低临床疗效或增加不良事件。 SDP显然不会诱导TRALI,过敏反应的风险明显低于QFFP。这三种血浆类型的共同点在于,从献血到冻结血浆之间的时间,以及是否使用全血血浆或单采血浆血浆作为起始原料,都是决定最终包装袋中凝血因子和抑制剂效能的决定性因素。捐献后3-6h冷冻的血浆和血液分离血浆比收集或全血血浆15-24h冷冻的血浆中含有大量的凝血因子和抑制剂。冻干和以适当比例合并具有ABO血型的单供体血浆单位(Uniplas)有助于SDP的处理和物流,而不会损失临床疗效。如果考虑到包括TRALI在内的非传染性不良事件,至少在年轻患者和预后良好的患者中,SDP显然至少与QFFP一样具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号