首页> 外文期刊>Transmission & Distribution World: The Information Leader Serving the Worldwide Power-Delivery Industry >The science of pole selection: Reliability-Based Design enables utilities to compare strength and loading characteristics of concrete, wood, steel and fiberglass poles
【24h】

The science of pole selection: Reliability-Based Design enables utilities to compare strength and loading characteristics of concrete, wood, steel and fiberglass poles

机译:电线杆选择的科学:基于可靠性的设计使公用事业公司可以比较混凝土,木材,钢和玻璃纤维电线杆的强度和载荷特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Construction in any industry is often guided by empirical results, but calculated designs are always preferred over experiential values. In building transmission and distribution lines within the power industry, the preference is no different. However, providing better designs is challenging when most U.S. states only require the lines to meet the minimum safety requirements of the National Electric Safety Code (NESC). The NESC was never intended to serve as a design code. Nevertheless, it has become the de facto standard by which many lines have been designed and constructed. One problem with the NESC is that the specified design load and strength factors do not have a strong theoretical foundation. Instead, these factors are primarily based on "successful" experience. As such, some utilities find the NESC requirements to be too conservative, while others feel they are not conservative enough and have seen fit to develop loading criteria to supplement the NESC requirements.
机译:任何行业中的建筑通常都以经验结果为指导,但是计算设计总是比经验值更可取。在电力行业内建设输配电线路时,偏好没有什么不同。但是,当大多数美国州仅要求线路符合国家电气安全法规(NESC)的最低安全要求时,提供更好的设计就具有挑战性。 NESC从未打算用作设计规范。然而,它已经成为设计和构造许多生产线的事实上的标准。 NESC的一个问题是指定的设计载荷和强度系数没有强大的理论基础。相反,这些因素主要基于“成功”的经验。因此,一些公用事业公司认为NESC要求过于保守,而另一些公用事业公司则认为它们不够保守,因此适合开发负荷标准以补充NESC要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号