首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the American Fisheries Society >Developing Standardized Methods for Sampling Freshwater Fishes with Multiple Gears: Effects of Sampling Order versus Sampling Method
【24h】

Developing Standardized Methods for Sampling Freshwater Fishes with Multiple Gears: Effects of Sampling Order versus Sampling Method

机译:开发多齿轮淡水鱼取样的标准化方法:取样顺序与取样方法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Developing robust methodologies for sampling freshwater fishes is important for the assessment and recovery of aquatic biodiversity. Commonly, sampling protocols recommend the use of both electrofishing and seining to reduce bias when sampling freshwater fishes. The objective of this study was to determine whether sampling method, sampling order, or the combination of these influenced the assessment of diversity and abundance of common or rare freshwater fishes at both the species and assemblage level. Fifty sites were sampled in the Sydenham River, Ontario, Canada, where paired sites were sampled using both electrofishing and seine netting in close proximity but also reversing the initial sampling order. Differences in the abundance and richness of common and rare freshwater fishes were tested with two-way ANOVA and multivariate ANOVA. Multivariate differences in the representation of species assemblages were compared using Procrustes analysis across ordinations built using differences in sampling method and sampling order. Electrofishing outperformed seine netting for maximizing the abundance of both all species caught (P = 0.004) and only those species considered rare (P = 0.049). While capture efficiencies generally decreased with subsequent sampling, the interaction between sampling method and sampling order for maximizing richness estimates of rare species was significant (P = 0.049). There were important species and assemblage differences when sampling order was reversed. The representation of either sunfishes (family Centrarchidae) or catfishes (family Ictaluridae) differed in multivariate space, given different sampling order. In addition, the capture of Blackstripe Topminnow Fundulus notatus was enhanced when seine netting was used after electrofishing. This study highlights the often neglected aspect of choosing an appropriate sampling order when developing protocols for sampling freshwater fishes with multiple methods. Overall, the combination of electrofishing, followed by seine netting, appears to maximize capture efficiencies of both common and rare fishes; however, researchers should be aware that sampling order can alter the representation of species and assemblages in multivariate assessments. Received July 11, 2013; accepted October 22, 2013
机译:开发强大的淡水鱼类抽样方法对于评估和恢复水生生物多样性至关重要。通常,采样规程建议同时使用电捕鱼和围网以减少对淡水鱼类采样时的偏差。这项研究的目的是确定采样方法,采样顺序或两者的组合是否影响了物种和组合水平上常见或稀有淡水鱼多样性和丰度的评估。在加拿大安大略省的Sydenham河中取样了五十个地点,在附近地点使用电钓鱼和围网对两个地点进行了取样,但也颠倒了最初的取样顺序。使用双向方差分析和多元方差分析测试了常见和稀有淡水鱼的丰度和丰富度差异。使用Procrustes分析法对物种组合表示中的多变量差异进行了比较,这些准则采用的采样方法和采样顺序有所不同。为了最大程度地捕捞所有被捕捞物种(P = 0.004)和只有那些被视为稀有物种(P = 0.049),电钓鱼优于围网。尽管捕获效率通常随随后的采样而降低,但采样方法和采样顺序之间的相互作用才可最大程度地提高稀有物种的丰富度估计值(P = 0.049)。颠倒采样顺序时,存在重要的物种和组合差异。在给定不同采样顺序的情况下,多变量空间中翻车鱼(中枢科)或cat鱼(Ictaluridae科)的表示形式有所不同。另外,当在电钓鱼后使用围网捕网时,黑条Topminnow绒毛的捕获得到了增强。这项研究强调了在制定多种方法对淡水鱼进行采样的方案时,选择适当的采样顺序通常会被忽略。总体而言,电钓鱼和围网相结合似乎可以使普通鱼和稀有鱼的捕捞效率最大化。但是,研究人员应该意识到,抽样顺序可以改变多变量评估中物种和组合的表示。 2013年7月11日收到;接受2013年10月22日

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号