首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Use of Fatal Real-Life Crashes to Analyze a Safe Road Transport System Model, Including the Road User, the Vehicle, and the Road
【24h】

Use of Fatal Real-Life Crashes to Analyze a Safe Road Transport System Model, Including the Road User, the Vehicle, and the Road

机译:使用致命的真实事故来分析安全的道路运输系统模型,包括道路使用者,车辆和道路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. To evaluate if the Swedish Road Administration (SRA) model for a safe road transport system, which includes the interaction between the road user, the vehicle, and the road, could be used to classify fatal car crashes according to some safety indicators. Also, to present a development of the model to better identify system weakness. Methods. Real-life crashes with a fatal outcome were classified according to the vehicle's safety rating by Euro NCAP (European Road Assessment Programme) and fitment of ESC (Electronic Stability Control). For each crash, the road was also classified according to EuroRAP (European Road Assessment Programme) criteria, and human behavior in terms of speeding, seat belt use, and driving under the influence of alcohol. Each crash was compared with the model criteria, to identify components that might have contributed to fatal outcome. All fatal crashes where a car occupant was killed that occurred in Sweden during 2004 were included: in all, 215 crashes with 248 fatalities. The data were collected from the in-depth fatal crash data of the Swedish Road Administration (SRA). Results. It was possible to classify 93% of the fatal car crashes according to the SRA model. A number of shortcomings in the criteria were identified since the model did not address rear-end or animal collisions or collisions with stationary/parked vehicles or trailers (18 out of 248 cases). Using the further developed model, it was possible to identify that most of the crashes occurred when two or all three components interacted (in 85 of the total 230 cases). Noncompliance with safety criteria for the road user, the vehicle, and the road led to fatal outcome in 43, 27, and 75 cases, respectively. Conclusions. The SRA model was found to be useful for classifying fatal crashes but needs to be further developed to identify how the components interact and thereby identify weaknesses in the road traffic system. This developed model might be a tool to systematically identify which of the components are linked to fatal outcome. In the presented study, fatal outcomes were mostly related to an interaction between the three components: the road, the vehicle, and the road user. Of the three components, the road was the one that was most often linked to a fatal outcome.
机译:目的。为了评估是否可以使用瑞典道路管理局(SRA)的安全道路运输系统模型(包括道路使用者,车辆和道路之间的相互作用)根据一些安全指标对致命车祸进行分类。另外,介绍模型的开发以更好地识别系统弱点。方法。根据欧洲NCAP(欧洲道路评估计划)对车辆的安全等级和ESC(电子稳定性控制)的规定,对具有致命后果的现实碰撞进行分类。对于每次撞车,还根据EuroRAP(欧洲道路评估计划)标准对道路进行分类,并根据超速,使用安全带和在酒精影响下驾驶等方面对人类行为进行分类。将每次坠机事故与模型标准进行比较,以识别可能导致致命结果的组件。 2004年在瑞典发生的所有死于汽车乘员的致命性碰撞都包括在内:总共215起碰撞事故,其中有248人死亡。该数据是从瑞典道路管理局(SRA)的深度致命车祸数据中收集的。结果。根据SRA模型,可以对93%的致命车祸进行分类。由于该模型未解决后端或动物碰撞或与固定/停放的车辆或拖车的碰撞(248个案例中的18个),因此确定了标准中的许多缺陷。使用进一步开发的模型,可以确定大多数崩溃是在两个或所有三个组件相互作用时发生的(总共230例中的85例)。不遵守针对道路使用者,车辆和道路的安全标准分别导致43、27和75例致命后果。结论。发现SRA模型对于分类致命事故很有用,但需要进一步开发以识别组件之间的交互方式,从而识别道路交通系统中的弱点。这种发达的模型可能是系统地识别哪些成分与致命结果相关的工具。在本研究中,致命的结果主要与以下三个部分之间的相互作用有关:道路,车辆和道路使用者。在这三个组成部分中,道路是最常与致命结果相关的道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号