首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Definition of Simulated Driving Tests for the Evaluation of Drivers' Reactions and Responses
【24h】

Definition of Simulated Driving Tests for the Evaluation of Drivers' Reactions and Responses

机译:模拟驾驶考试的定义,用于评估驾驶员的反应和反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: This article aims at identifying the most significant measures in 2 perception-response (PR) tests performed at a driving simulator: a braking test and a lateral skid test, which were developed in this work. Methods: Forty-eight subjects (26 females and 22 males) with a mean age of 24.9 ± 3.0 years were enrolled for this study. They were asked to perform a drive on the driving simulator at the University of Pisa (Italy) following a specific test protocol, including 8-10 braking tests and 8-10 lateral skid tests. Driver input signals and vehicle model signals were recorded during the drives and analyzed to extract measures such as the reaction time, first response time, etc. Following a statistical procedure (based on analysis of variance [ANOVA] and post hoc tests), all test measures (3 for the braking test and 8 for the lateral skid test) were analyzed in terms of statistically significant differences among different drivers. The presented procedure allows evaluation of the capability of a given test to distinguish among different drivers. Results: In the braking test, the reaction time showed a high dispersion among single drivers, leading to just 4.8 percent of statistically significant driver pairs (using the Games-Howell post hoc test), whereas the pedal transition time scored 31.9 percent. In the lateral skid test, 28.5 percent of the 2 × 2 comparisons showed significantly different reaction times, 19.5 percent had different response times, 35.2 percent had a different second peak of the steering wheel signal, and 33 percent showed different values of the integral of the steering wheel signal. Conclusions: For the braking test, which has been widely employed in similar forms in the literature, it was shown how the reaction time, with respect to the pedal transition time, can have a higher dispersion due to the influence of external factors. For the lateral skid test, the following measures were identified as the most significant for application studies: the reaction time for the reaction phase, the second peak of the steering wheel angle for the first instinctive response, and the integral of the steering wheel angle for the complete response. The methodology used to analyze the test measures was founded on statistically based and objective evaluation criteria and could be applied to other tests. Even if obtained with a fixed-base simulator, the obtained results represent useful information for applications of the presented PR tests in experimental campaigns with driving simulators. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Traffic Injury Prevention to view the supplemental file.
机译:目的:本文旨在确定在驾驶模拟器中进行的2种感知响应(PR)测试中最重要的措施:制动测试和侧滑测试。方法:本研究招募了平均年龄为24.9±3.0岁的48位受试者(26位女性和22位男性)。他们被要求按照特定的测试规程在比萨大学(意大利)的驾驶模拟器上进行驾驶,包括8-10次制动测试和8-10次侧滑测试。在驾驶过程中记录驾驶员输入信号和车辆模型信号并进行分析,以提取出反应时间,首次响应时间等度量。按照统计程序(基于方差分析[ANOVA]和事后检验),进行所有测试根据不同驾驶员之间的统计显着性差异来分析测量(3个用于制动测试,8个用于侧滑测试)。所介绍的过程可以评估给定测试区分不同驱动因素的能力。结果:在制动测试中,反应时间显示出单个驾驶员之间的分散程度很高,仅占统计上有意义的驾驶员对的4.8%(使用Games-Howell事后测试),而踏板过渡时间得分为31.9%。在侧滑试验中,2×2比较中的28.5%显示出明显不同的反应时间,19.5%具有不同的响应时间,35.2%具有不同的方向盘第二峰值,33%显示出不同的积分值。方向盘信号。结论:对于制动测试,该测试已在文献中以类似形式广泛使用,显示了由于外部因素的影响,相对于踏板过渡时间的反应时间如何具有更高的分散性。对于侧滑试验,确定了以下对应用研究最重要的措施:反应阶段的反应时间,对于第一个本能响应的方向盘角度的第二个峰值以及对于第一个本能响应的方向盘角度的积分完整的回应。用于分析测试方法的方法是基于统计和客观评估标准建立的,可以应用于其他测试。即使使用固定基础的模拟器获得的结果也代表有用的信息,这些信息对于在驾驶模拟器的实验活动中应用提出的PR测试非常有用。补充材料可用于本文。转到发布者的在线交通伤害预防在线版本以查看补充文件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号