首页> 外文期刊>Toxicon: An International Journal Devoted to the Exchange of Knowledge on the Poisons Derived from Animals, Plants and Microorganisms >The validity of two HPLC methods and a colorimetric PP2A assay related to the mouse bioassay in quantification of diarrhetic toxins in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis)
【24h】

The validity of two HPLC methods and a colorimetric PP2A assay related to the mouse bioassay in quantification of diarrhetic toxins in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis)

机译:两种HPLC方法和比色PP2A测定法与小鼠生物测定法相关联的定量对蓝贻贝(Mytilus edulis)腹泻毒素的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Validity of two HPLC methods and a PP2A assay in relation to the mouse bioassay for diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins was evaluated. The mouse bioassay for DSP toxins was performed on a total of 177 mussel samples from the Sognefjord, Norway, using diethyl ether in the final step of extraction. For fluorimetric HPLC analyses, either 4-bromomethyl-7-methoxycoumarin (BrMMC) or 9-anthryl diazomethane (ADAM) were used for analysis of 48 and 118 of the samples, respectively. The colorimetric PP2A inhibition assay was performed on all 177 samples that were analysed with the mouse bioassay. When comparing the HPLC-BrMMC, the HPLC-ADAM and the PP2A assays with the mouse bioassay, cut off values of less than or equal to4, 5 and 6 mug okadaic acid (OA) equivalents (eq.)/5 g digestive gland (DG) was used. With reference to the results from the mouse bioassay, the total number of failure and correct classification by HPLC-ADAM and the PP2A method was compared for the three cut off values. No significant differences between the methods were detected. However, all differences were found in favour of HPLC-ADAM. All three methods could replace the mouse bioassay in detecting levels of diarrhetic toxins approved internationally for safe consumption of mussels. However, HPLC-ADAM seems to be the method of choice. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [References: 23]
机译:评估了两种HPLC方法和PP2A测定法相对于小鼠生物测定法对腹泻性贝类中毒(DSP)毒素的有效性。在提取的最后一步中,使用乙醚对挪威Sognefjord的总共177个贻贝样品进行了小鼠DSP毒素生物测定。对于荧光HPLC分析,分别使用4-溴甲基-7-甲氧基香豆素(BrMMC)或9-氨基重氮甲烷(ADAM)分别分析了48个样品和118个样品。比色PP2A抑制试验在所有177个样品中进行了比色,该样品用小鼠生物测定法进行了分析。在将HPLC-BrMMC,HPLC-ADAM和PP2A分析与小鼠生物分析进行比较时,截断值小于或等于4、5和6杯冈田酸(OA)当量(eq。)/ 5 g消化腺(使用DG)。参考小鼠生物测定法的结果,比较了HPLC-ADAM和PP2A方法的失败总数和正确分类的三个临界值。方法之间未发现明显差异。但是,发现所有差异都有利于HPLC-ADAM。所有这三种方法都可以代替小鼠生物测定法,以检测国际认可的安全食用贻贝的腹泻毒素水平。但是,HPLC-ADAM似乎是选择的方法。 (C)2001 Elsevier ScienceLtd。保留所有权利。 [参考:23]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号