...
首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology: An International Journal Concerned with the Effects of Chemicals on Living Systems >Modeling the metabolic competency of glutathione S-transferases using genetically modified cell lines.
【24h】

Modeling the metabolic competency of glutathione S-transferases using genetically modified cell lines.

机译:使用基因修饰的细胞系对谷胱甘肽S-转移酶的代谢能力进行建模。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Certain chemopreventive agents are thought to work in part via induction of GST expression. We have utilized transgenic cell lines to show that GST expression can protect against DNA alkylation, and in some cases cytotoxicity caused by electrophilic carcinogens conjugated by GSTs (e.g. 4-NQO, B[a]P, DiB[a,l]P, AFB(1), and certain drugs). However, factors governing protection by GST are complex and vary with different agents and end-points. For example, expression of GST alone was sufficient for partial protection against DNA alkylation by 4-NQO, but protection against 4-NQO cytotoxicity was only observed when the ATP-dependent GS-X transport protein MRP1 was also co-expressed. The dynamic competition between activation and detoxification is the focus of current studies in cells that co-express both CYP1A1 and either hGSTP1 or hGSTM1. Expression of hGSTP1 largely blocked B[a]P toxicity induced via the moderate activation by rat or human CYP1A1. With DiB[a,l]P, GSTs gave up to 7-fold protection against toxicity only when activated by human CYP1A1. However, cells with CYP1A1+GST remained at least 20-fold more sensitive to DiB[a,l]P than parent cells lacking either activity, due to strong activation by hCYP1A1. In summary, we have found that protection by GSTs against B[a]P or DiB[a,l]P toxicity is highly variable depending on differences in: (a) the PAH structure; (b) the human vs. rat CYP1A1 expressed; (c) GST isozyme(s) expressed; (d) cellular expression of conjugate transporters; or (e) DNA damage versus cytoxicity end-points.
机译:某些化学预防剂被认为部分通过诱导GST表达起作用。我们已经利用转基因细胞系来显示GST表达可以防止DNA烷基化,并且在某些情况下,由GST结合的亲电致癌物(例如4-NQO,B [a] P,DiB [a,l] P,AFB)引起的细胞毒性(1)和某些药物)。但是,由商品及服务税(GST)保护的控制因素很复杂,并且随代理和端点的不同而不同。例如,仅GST的表达就足以部分保护4-NQO对抗DNA烷基化,但是仅在还依赖于ATP依赖性GS-X转运蛋白MRP1的情况下才观察到针对4-NQO细胞毒性的保护。激活和解毒之间的动态竞争是目前共表达CYP1A1和hGSTP1或hGSTM1的细胞研究的重点。 hGSTP1的表达在很大程度上阻断了由大鼠或人CYP1A1的中等激活诱导的B [a] P毒性。使用DiB [a,l] P时,仅当被人CYP1A1激活时,GST才提供高达7倍的抗毒性保护。然而,由于hCYP1A1的强激活作用,具有CYP1A1 + GST的细胞对DiB [a,l] P的敏感性至少比没有这两种活性的亲本细胞高20倍。总之,我们发现,GST对B [a] P或DiB [a,l] P毒性的保护作用在很大程度上取决于以下方面的差异:(a)PAH结构; (b)人与大鼠的CYP1A1表达; (c)表达的GST同工酶; (d)缀合转运蛋白的细胞表达; (e)DNA损伤与细胞毒性终点之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号