...
首页> 外文期刊>Surface and Interface Analysis: SIA: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Techniques for the Analysis of Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films >Elastic scattering corrections in AES and XPS .2. Estimating attenuation lengths and conditions required for their valid use in overlayer/substrate experiments
【24h】

Elastic scattering corrections in AES and XPS .2. Estimating attenuation lengths and conditions required for their valid use in overlayer/substrate experiments

机译:AES和XPS中的弹性散射校正2。估算衰减长度和在覆盖层/基板实验中有效使用所需的条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We examine substrate/overlayer experiments and the equations commonly used to quantify overlayer thicknesses, Comparisons with accurate Monte-Carlo simulations show that using attenuation lengths (rather than inelastic mean free paths) eliminates most of the error due to elastic scattering without increasing the complexity of the quantification. We give attenutation lengths for 27 elements, calculated by the criterion that systematic errors in such quantifications should be minimized, These are therefore the best attenuation length values to use in layerwise quantification. We show that, provided these attenuation length values are used, the error in estimation of the thickness of an overlayer due to elastic scattering can be limited to +/-(5% + 1 Angstrom) for an emission angle less than or equal to 58 degrees from the surface normal, and +/-(10% + 1 Angstrom) for an emission angle less than or equal to 63 degrees from the surface normal, This accuracy is acceptable for most analytical work, Other methods (such as analytical transport theory) are much more complicated, and achieve ii high precision that is often unnecessary in view of other uncertainties typically present in these experiments (such as errors due to surface morphology and diffraction effects), The results presented here, using the full theory, show that the analyst's simple straight-line approximation is in fact of adequate accuracy, provided that the correct values of attenuation length are used, Simple semi-empirical equations are presented, which allow the analyst to estimate the attenuation length for electrons of kinetic Energy between 50 and 2000 eV, to a standard uncertainty of 6%. (C) 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:我们检查了衬底/覆盖层实验以及通常用于量化覆盖层厚度的方程式,与精确的蒙特卡洛模拟进行比较后发现,使用衰减长度(而不是非弹性平均自由程)可以消除由于弹性散射而产生的大多数误差,而不会增加量化。我们给出了27个元素的衰减长度,其衰减标准是应将此类量化中的系统误差减至最小。因此,这是用于分层量化的最佳衰减长度值。我们表明,如果使用这些衰减长度值,则对于小于或等于58°的发射角度,由于弹性散射而导致的覆盖层厚度估计中的误差可以限制为+/-(5%+1埃)。相对于表面法线的角度,以及相对于表面法线的角度小于或等于63度的发射角度的+/-(10%+1埃),此精度对于大多数分析工作都是可接受的,其他方法(例如分析迁移理论) )要复杂得多,并且要达到ii的高精度,鉴于这些实验中通常存在的其他不确定性(例如由于表面形态和衍射效应引起的误差),这通常是不必要的。使用完整的理论,此处给出的结果表明如果使用正确的衰减长度值,则分析人员的简单直线近似实际上具有足够的准确性,并提供了简单的半经验方程,使分析人员可以估算出动能电子的最大长度为50至2000 eV,标准不确定度为6%。 (C)1997年,John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号