...
首页> 外文期刊>Surface and Interface Analysis: SIA: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Techniques for the Analysis of Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films >Peak or centroid - which parameter is better suited for quantifying apparent marker locations in low-energy sputter depth profiling with reactive primary ion beams?
【24h】

Peak or centroid - which parameter is better suited for quantifying apparent marker locations in low-energy sputter depth profiling with reactive primary ion beams?

机译:峰或质心-哪个参数更适合于量化具有反应性一次离子束的低能溅射深度分析中的表观标记位置?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Silicon samples containing narrow boron markers were depth profiled using normally incident 0.25-1 keV O-2(+) ion beams in combination with secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The profiles revealed significant deviations from ideal delta distributions, either as tails or shoulders. All tracer profiles exhibited the well-known apparent shift towards the surface, which is due to the initial decrease in erosion rate. The peak positions, z, showed a much more pronounced non-linear energy-dependent shift than the centroids, , up to a factor of 2 stronger. To evaluate the form of measured profiles, a reduced shape parameter is defined as Delta = - z. For ideal deltas, this parameter can be calculated using the analytical resolution function (rf) after Dowsett et al. Depending on the orientation and magnitude of the tracer distortions, the measured values of Delta differed from Delta (rf) by up to 0.8 run. This difference is attributed to the fact that the 'weight' of the distortions gives rise to a corresponding change of . The results imply that (relative) marker locations are determined more safely from z than from . Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [References: 20]
机译:使用垂直入射的0.25-1 keV O-2(+)离子束结合二次离子质谱(SIMS)对包含窄硼标记的硅样品进行深度剖析。轮廓显示出与理想的三角洲分布明显不同,无论是尾巴还是肩膀。所有示踪剂剖面都表现出众所周知的朝向表面的表观偏移,这是由于腐蚀速率的最初降低所致。峰位置z显示出比质心更明显的非线性能量依赖性位移,强度最高可提高2倍。为了评估测量轮廓的形式,将减小的形状参数定义为Delta = -z。对于理想的增量,可以使用Dowsett等人之后的解析分辨率函数(rf)计算该参数。根据示踪剂畸变的方向和大小,Delta的测量值与Delta(rf)的差异最大为0.8游程。这种差异归因于这样一个事实,即失真的“权重”引起相应的变化。结果表明,相对于,从z更安全地确定(相对)标记位置。版权所有(C)2001 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd. [参考:20]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号