【24h】

Critical analysis of successful gold exploration methods

机译:成功金矿勘探方法的批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To assess common factors and the key exploration methods in gold discovery we analyse 154 case studies of successful gold exploration. Our aim is to highlight what may help find gold in the future. The case studies used here are only those documented in the consistent series of biennial volumes of New Generation Gold from 1995 to 2013. Surface and near surface sampling dominate early phases of exploration. Subsequently, as a second and third priority drilling, initially rotary air blast or air-core and then reverse circulation and diamond core drilling dominate exploration. The priority order of methods is more or less the order of access from surface. However, some discoveries document reverse circulation or diamond core drilling as the first and primary method suggesting success by bold targeting and early drilling. Gold has no direct recognisable geophysical signature but geophysics is used as an indirect tool to model the geology and weathering. Geophysical methods, be they magnetic or electrical methods, maintain a similar level of interest throughout programmes. Alteration science is recorded as a method in only 13% of discoveries, a comment that may seem at odds with the modern focus on hyperspectral mapping and logging. Similarly and despite being unambiguously the principal control on gold mineralisation, structure is recorded as of use in only 53% of discoveries, usually a 3rd or 4th priority. Of the case studies, 16% make no mention of structure at all. It is surprising that when surface outcrop is available, structural geology is rarely documented as an exploration method. The low levels of reporting of the intellectual activities of alteration and structural geology (and to a lesser extent mapping and geophysics) suggests they are (i) under-reported or, (ii) that current science is inadequate (this is unlikely) or, (iii) they are under-utilised. If under-reported, are the senior managers and directors who wrote these papers aware of the intellectual effort of their teams? Alternatively if under-used, alteration and structure may represent a significant opportunity for the next generation of exploration.
机译:为了评估金矿发现的共同因素和关键勘探方法,我们分析了154个成功金矿勘探的案例研究。我们的目的是强调将来可能会帮助找到黄金的因素。这里使用的案例研究仅是1995年至2013年连续两年的新一代金的连续记录系列中记录的那些。地表和近地表采样主导着勘探的早期阶段。随后,作为第二和第三优先钻探,首先是旋转鼓风或空心钻探,然后是反向循环钻探和金刚石钻探钻探。方法的优先顺序或多或少是从表面访问的顺序。但是,一些发现记录了反向循环或金刚石岩心钻探是第一个也是主要方法,表明通过大胆瞄准和早期钻探获得成功。金没有可直接识别的地球物理特征,但是地球物理被用作对地质和风化进行建模的间接工具。地球物理方法,无论是电磁方法还是电方法,在整个计划中都保持着相似的兴趣水平。仅有13%的发现将改变科学记录为一种方法,这一评论可能与现代对高光谱制图和测井的关注不一致。同样,尽管明确地确定了金矿化的主要控制因素,但只有53%的发现记录了使用时的结构,通常是第三或第四优先级。在案例研究中,有16%的人根本没有提到结构。令人惊讶的是,当表面露头可用时,很少记录结构地质作为勘探方法。对蚀变和结构地质的智力活动(以及程度较小的制图和地球物理学)的报道很少,这表明(i)报告不足,或者(ii)当前科学不足(这不太可能),或者, (iii)使用不足。如果报道不足,写这些论文的高级经理和董事是否意识到他们团队的智力努力?另外,如果未充分利用,变更和结构可能为下一代勘探提供重要的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号