首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery >On the internal efficiency of a turbine stage: classical and computational fluid dynamics definitions
【24h】

On the internal efficiency of a turbine stage: classical and computational fluid dynamics definitions

机译:关于涡轮级的内部效率:经典和计算流体动力学定义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Almost entire fleet of steam turbines in Poland was designed between 1950-1980 with the use of the so-called zero-dimensional (OD) calculation tools. For several years, design and modernization of the turbines occur in assistance with the state-of-the-art methods that describe working fluid flow field based on three-dimensional (3D) models and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes. This cooperation between OD and 3D codes requires exchange of overall, integral information such as: power, efficiency, heat and mass fluxes. In consequence the question arises regarding the cohesion of definitions, and particularly regarding the correctness of the definition for internal efficiency of the turbine's stage and the turbine as a whole. In the present paper we formulate basic definitions reason of efficiency that are naturally adapted to the numerical OD and 3D models. We show that the main reason of differences between the definitions in OD and 3D is the definition of the theoretical work of the stage l_t. In the classical OD models, mostly employed is the isentropic approach, and hence the isentropic efficiency occurs. Meanwhile, in the increasingly common 3D approach (most likely by CFD), we use more physically correct pathway by subtracting energy loss from the available energy, that leads to the polytropic definition of efficiency. We show an example of computing the efficiency and the 3D losses, denoted with additional subscript CFD, we also discuss benefits of this definition in comparison with the isentropic classical definition in OD.
机译:波兰几乎所有的蒸汽轮机机队都是在1950年至1980年之间使用所谓的零维(OD)计算工具进行设计的。几年来,涡轮机的设计和现代化都是在借助基于三维(3D)模型和计算流体力学(CFD)代码描述工作流体流场的最新方法的帮助下进行的。 OD和3D代码之间的这种协作需要交换整体的整体信息,例如:功率,效率,热和质量通量。结果,出现了关于定义的内聚性的问题,尤其是关于涡轮级和整个涡轮的内部效率的定义的正确性。在本文中,我们制定了效率​​原因的基本定义,这些基本定义自然适用于数值OD和3D模型。我们表明,OD和3D中定义之间差异的主要原因是阶段l_t的理论工作的定义。在经典的OD模型中,主要采用等熵方法,因此会产生等熵效率。同时,在越来越普遍的3D方法(最可能是CFD)中,我们通过从可用能量中减去能量损失来使用更物理上正确的路径,从而得出了效率的多变定义。我们展示了一个计算效率和3D损耗的示例,用额外的下标CFD表示,并且与OD中的等熵经典定义相比,我们还讨论了此定义的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号