首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Simulating the surface energy balance in a soybean canopy with the SHAW and RZ-SHAW models.
【24h】

Simulating the surface energy balance in a soybean canopy with the SHAW and RZ-SHAW models.

机译:使用SHAW和RZ-SHAW模型模拟大豆冠层中的表面能平衡。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Correct simulation of surface energy balance in a crop canopy is critical for better understanding of soil water balance, canopy and soil temperature, plant water stress, and plant growth. One existing effort is to incorporate the surface energy balance in the Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) model into the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM). In this study, an improved version of the RZ-SHAW (RZWQM-SHAW) hybrid model was tested for energy balance components, canopy and soil temperature, evapotranspiration (ET), and soil water content against eddy covariance data measured in a soybean canopy and against predictions of the original SHAW and RZWQM models. The experiment was first used previously to test the SHAW model for radiation energy fluxes within the canopy without examining the energy balance components, soil water balance, and soil temperature. The same parameters from that study were used in both the SHAW model and RZ-SHAW hybrid model without any modification in this study. In terms of root mean squared error (RMSE), both RZ-SHAW and SHAW simulated net radiation, sensible heat, and latent heat well. However, the ground heat flux simulated by RZ-SHAW was less accurate, with RMSE of 28.9 W m-2 compared to 22.6 W m-2 with SHAW, which could be due to differences in simulated soil evaporation. Simulated soil temperature at both 1.5 cm and 4.5 cm depths with RZ-SHAW was comparable to that of SHAW, with RMSE of 2.18 degrees C and 2.23 degrees C, respectively, compared to 2.13 degrees C and 2.20 degrees C with SHAW. Similarly, simulated canopy temperature was essentially the same, with RMSE values of 1.77 degrees C with RZ-SHAW and 1.69 degrees C with SHAW. Simulated surface soil water content was reasonable for both models. Simulated ET had an RMSE of 0.069 cm d-1 with RZ-SHAW and 0.074 cm d-1 with SHAW. The new RZ-SHAW model was an improvement over the original RZWQM model in simulating soil temperature and moisture, in addition to its ability to provide complete energy balance and canopy temperature.
机译:正确模拟作物冠层的表面能平衡对于更好地理解土壤水分平衡,冠层和土壤温度,植物水分胁迫以及植物生长至关重要。现有的一项工作是将同时供热和水(SHAW)模型中的表面能平衡纳入根区水质模型(RZWQM)。在这项研究中,对RZ-SHAW(RZWQM-SHAW)混合模型的改进版本进行了能量平衡成分,冠层和土壤温度,蒸散量(ET)和土壤水分的测试,以对比大豆冠层和土壤中的涡度协方差数据。反对原始的SHAW和RZWQM模型的预测。该实验先前首先用于测试SHAW模型的顶篷内辐射能量通量,而无需检查能量平衡分量,土壤水平衡和土壤温度。在SHAW模型和RZ-SHAW混合模型中均使用了与该研究相同的参数,但未对​​此研究进行任何修改。就均方根误差(RMSE)而言,RZ-SHAW和SHAW都很好地模拟了净辐射,显热和潜热。但是,RZ-SHAW模拟的地热通量精度较差,RMSE为28.9 W m -2 ,而SHAW的22.6 W m -2 可能是由于模拟土壤蒸发的差异。 RZ-SHAW在1.5 cm和4.5 cm深度处的模拟土壤温度与SHAW相当,RMSE分别为2.18摄氏度和2.23摄氏度,而SHAW的模拟土壤温度分别为2.13摄氏度和2.20摄氏度。类似地,模拟的冠层温度基本相同,RZ-SHAW的RMSE值为1.77摄氏度,SHAW的RMSE值为1.69摄氏度。对于两种模型,模拟的表层土壤含水量都是合理的。模拟ET在RZ-SHAW条件下的RMSE为0.069 cm d -1 ,在SHAW条件下为0.074 cm d -1 。新的RZ-SHAW模型在模拟土壤温度和湿度方面是对原始RZWQM模型的改进,此外它还具有提供完全能量平衡和冠层温度的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号