首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >A Case Study to Evaluate Field Shape Factors for Estimating Overlap Errors with Manual and Automatic Section Control
【24h】

A Case Study to Evaluate Field Shape Factors for Estimating Overlap Errors with Manual and Automatic Section Control

机译:用手动和自动截面控制评估场形因子以估计重叠误差的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Understanding how field shape and size may affect overlap errors during spraying operations would provide producers with better information on how to improve field operations and cut costs. The goal of this study was to evaluate field shape factors through single-variable and multivariate regression analyses for predicting overlap from a manual section control (MSC) and two automatic section control (ASC) systems. Actual field coverage data collected from three self-propelled agricultural sprayers with boom widths of 24.8 m were used in the analysis. Results of statistical analyses indicated that significant relationships existed between over-application error and multiple field shape factors. The strongest single-variable relationship existed between field perimeter-to-area ratio (PIA) and the overlap error (% of field area) for the MSC and seven- and nine-section ASC systems, with model standard errors of 4.95%, 1.45%, and 0.81%, respectively. Multivariate regression yielded strong relationshipswith different combinations of field shape factors and overlap error; however, multivariate models did not result in a vast improvement over the single-variable model using PI A. Errors increased at a greater rate with MSC, which suggested that as fieldinclusions (e.g., grassed waterways) increase, or the field boundary becomes more complex, overlap error reduction may be reduced with ASC. As expected, nine-section ASC resulted in reduced overlap errors compared to the seven-section system as PI A increased. Comparing models for the ASC systems indicated that the reduction in overlap application may not significantly improve when adding two additional control sections for fields with low PI A values (<0.0175).
机译:了解田间形状和尺寸如何影响喷涂操作期间的重叠误差将为生产者提供有关如何改善田间操作和降低成本的更好信息。这项研究的目的是通过单变量和多变量回归分析评估场形状因子,以预测手动切片控制(MSC)和两个自动切片控制(ASC)系统的重叠。在分析中使用了从三台吊杆宽度为24.8 m的自行式农业喷雾机收集的实际田间覆盖数据。统计分析结果表明,应用过度误差与多个场形因子之间存在显着关系。对于MSC和7段和9段ASC系统,场周长比(PIA)与重叠误差(场面积的百分比)之间存在最强的单变量关系,模型标准误差为4.95%,1.45 %和0.81%。多元回归与场形因子和重叠误差的不同组合产生了很强的关系。但是,多变量模型并没有比使用PI A的单变量模型有很大的改进。MSC的误差增加的幅度更大,这表明随着田间夹杂物(例如,草地水道)的增加,或者田间边界变得更加复杂,使用ASC可以减少重叠误差的减少。正如预期的那样,与九段系统相比,九段ASC可以减少重叠误差,因为PI A增加了。 ASC系统的比较模型表明,为低PI A值(<0.0175)的字段添加两个附加控制部分时,重叠应用的减少可能不会显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号