首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >NEXRAD stage III precipitation local bias adjustment for streamflow prediction. (Special Issue: Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) modeling technology: current status.)
【24h】

NEXRAD stage III precipitation local bias adjustment for streamflow prediction. (Special Issue: Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) modeling technology: current status.)

机译:NEXRAD III级降水局部偏差调整,用于流量预测。 (特刊:水土评估工具(SWAT)建模技术:当前状态。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prediction accuracy of physically based hydrologic models largely depends on how well the models and input data represent the real world in terms of precipitation, topography, soils, land use/land cover, and land management. Precipitation is, by far, the largest source of uncertainty; misestimating it by a small percentage leads to inadequate soil-moisture accounting and subsequent inaccuracy in runoff and streamflow estimation. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the optimum local bias adjustment factor (BAF) threshold limits (TLs) by using SWAT-modeled streamflow values and frequency distributions with NEXRAD or raingauge precipitation inputs, and (2) to assess the impact of BAF TLs derived from 40 raingauges in and around a large watershed in west central Kansas on hydrologic response of the SWAT model. NEXRAD overestimated precipitation depths (45% to 184%) in warm months including April to September and underestimated depths (33% to 64%) in cold months including December to February; the remaining months had fairly close estimates (within +or-20%). Assessment of bias-adjusted NEXRAD data based on daily raingauge comparisons found the best model efficiency (Ef) using 0.15 lower TL, whereas the lowest bias was for 0.33 lower TL, both with 2.0 upper TL. However, assessment of NEXRAD data based on predicted versus observed daily streamflow found the best Ef using 0.15 lower TL and the lowest bias using 0.25 lower TL. NEXRAD data bias-adjusted using TLs of 2.0 (upper) combined with 0.15 (lower) produced satisfactory streamflow results, similar to the default nearest-raingauge method used in SWAT. This result is encouraging considering the substantial seasonal bias evident in the Stage III NEXRAD data and it indicates the potential for future improvements in streamflow simulation accuracy as NEXRAD accuracy increases. This study demonstrated that TLs are needed in bias-adjustment of NEXRAD data for reasonable hydrologic simulation, and that better streamflow simulation accuracy is obtained if the optimum TLs are based on streamflow assessment rather than assessment of the precipitation data.
机译:基于物理的水文模型的预测准确性在很大程度上取决于模型和输入数据在降水,地形,土壤,土地利用/土地覆盖和土地管理方面代表现实世界的程度。到目前为止,降水是最大的不确定性来源。对其进行很小的错误估计会导致土壤水分核算不足,进而导致径流和流量估算的不准确性。这项研究的目标是(1)使用NEXRAD或雨量计降水量输入的SWAT模型流值和频率分布来确定最佳局部偏差调整因子(BAF)阈值极限(TLs),以及(2)评估影响源于堪萨斯州中西部大流域及其周围的40个雨量计的BAF TL对SWAT模型的水文响应的影响。 NEXRAD在包括4月至9月的温暖月份高估了降水深度(45%至184%),而在包括12月至2月的寒冷月份高估了降水深度(33%至64%);其余月份的估算值非常接近(在+或-20%以内)。根据日常雨量计比较对偏差调整后的NEXRAD数据进行评估,发现使用0.15较低的TL可获得最佳模型效率(E f ),而最低偏差为0.33的较低TL,两者均具有2.0较高的TL。但是,根据预测的和观察到的每日流量对NEXRAD数据进行评估,发现使用0.15较低的TL可获得最佳的E f ,使用0.25较低的TL可获得最低的偏差。使用2.0(上)的TL和0.15(下)的TL进行偏置调整的NEXRAD数据产生了令人满意的流结果,类似于SWAT中使用的默认最近雨量法。考虑到第三阶段NEXRAD数据中明显的季节性偏差,这一结果令人鼓舞,它表明随着NEXRAD精度的提高,流量模拟精度未来有提高的潜力。这项研究表明,在进行NEXRAD数据的偏差调整时,需要使用TL来进行合理的水文模拟,并且如果最佳TL基于流量评估而不是对降水数据的评估,则可以获得更好的流量模拟精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号