...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Effect of dripline flushing on subsurface drip irrigation systems.
【24h】

Effect of dripline flushing on subsurface drip irrigation systems.

机译:滴灌线冲洗对地下滴灌系统的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The velocity of dripline flushing in subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) systems affects system design, cost, management, performance, and longevity. A 30-day field study was conducted at Kansas State University (USA) to analyse the effect of four targeted flushing velocities (0.23, 0.30, 0.46, and 0.61 m/s) for a fixed 15-minute duration of flushing and three flushing frequencies (no flushing or flushing every 15 or 30 days) on SDI emitter discharge and sediments within the dripline and removed in the flushing water. At the end of the field experiment (371 h), the amount of solids carried away by the flushing water and retained in every lateral were determined as well as laboratory determination of emitter discharge for every single emitter within each dripline. Greater dripline flushing velocities, which also resulted in greater flushing volumes, tended to result in greater amounts of solids in the flushing water, but the differences were not always statistically significant. Neither the frequency of flushing nor the interaction of flushing frequency and velocity significantly affected the amount of solids in the flushing water. There was a greater concentration of solids in the beginning one-third of the 90 m laterals, particularly for treatments with no flushing or with slower dripline flushing velocities. As flushing velocity and concurrently flushing volume increased, there was a tendency for greater solids removal and/or more equal distribution within the dripline. At the end of the field study, the average emitter discharge as measured in the laboratory for a total of 3970 emitters was 0.64 litre/h, which was significantly less (approximately 2.5%) than the discharge for new and unused emitters. Only six emitters were nearly or fully clogged, with discharges between 0 and 5% of new and unused emitters. Flushing velocity and flushing frequency did not have consistent significant effects on emitter discharge, and those numerical differences that did exist were small (<3%). Emitter discharge was approximately 3% less for the distal ends of the driplines (last 20% of the dripline). Although not a specific factor in the study, the results of solids removals during flushing and solids retention within the different dripline sections suggest that duration of flushing may be a more cost-effective management option than increasing the dripline flushing velocity through SDI system design. Finally, although microirrigation system components have been improved over the years, the need for flushing to remove solids and reduce clogging potential has not been eliminated.
机译:地下滴灌(SDI)系统中滴灌线冲洗的速度会影响系统设计,成本,管理,性能和寿命。在美国堪萨斯州立大学进行了为期30天的现场研究,分析了固定冲洗时间15分钟和三种冲洗频率下四种目标冲洗速度(0.23、0.30、0.46和0.61 m / s)的影响(每15或30天不进行冲洗或每15天或30天冲洗一次)SDI发射器的排放物和滴水线内的沉淀物,并从冲洗水中去除。在现场试验结束(371小时)后,确定了冲洗水带走并保留在每个侧边的固体量,并确定了每个滴水线中每个单个发射器的发射器排放量的实验室测定。较大的滴水管冲洗速度(也导致较大的冲洗量)往往会导致冲洗水中的固体含量增加,但差异并不总是统计显着的。冲洗频率和冲洗频率与速度的相互作用都不会显着影响冲洗水中的固体含量。在90 m的横向管道中,开始的三分之一中有较高的固体浓度,特别是对于不冲洗或滴水线冲洗速度较慢的处理。随着冲洗速度和同时冲洗体积的增加,存在着更大的固体去除和/或滴水线内更均匀分布的趋势。在实地研究结束时,实验室测量的总共3970个发射器的平均发射器排放为0.64升/小时,这比新的和未使用的发射器的排放量要少得多(约2.5%)。只有六个发射器几乎或完全堵塞,放电量为新发射器和未使用发射器的0%至5%。冲洗速度和冲洗频率对发射极放电没有一致的显着影响,并且确实存在的那些数值差异很小(<3%)。滴水线的末端(滴水线的最后20%)的发射极排放量减少约3%。尽管不是研究中的特定因素,但冲洗过程中固体去除的结果以及不同滴水线部分中的固体滞留结果表明,冲洗持续时间可能比通过SDI系统设计提高滴水线冲洗速度更具成本效益。最后,尽管这些年来微灌系统的组件已得到改善,但仍没有消除冲洗以去除固体和减少堵塞可能性的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号