首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Corn yield and water use characteristics as affected by tillage, plant density, and irrigation.
【24h】

Corn yield and water use characteristics as affected by tillage, plant density, and irrigation.

机译:耕作,植物密度和灌溉影响玉米产量和水分利用特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Maize (Zea mays.) was grown on a deep, well drained silt loam soil (Aridic Argiustolls) at Colby, Kansas, USA, from 2004 to 2007 using three plant densities (66 300, 74 500, or 82 300 plants/ha) under conventional, strip, or no tillage systems for irrigation capacities that were limited to 25 mm every 4, 6, or 8 days. Maize yield increased approximately 10% (1.43 tonnes/ha) from the minimum to maximum irrigation capacity in these four years of varying precipitation and crop evapotranspiration. Although strip tillage and no tillage had numerically greater grain yields than conventional tillage in all four years (approx. 8.1 and 6.4% (1.11 and 0.88 tonnes/ha), respectively, for the four-year average), strip tillage was significantly greater in only two years and no tillage in only one year. Seasonal water use of the crop tended to be greater for the strip tillage and no tillage treatments as compared to conventional tillage and was significantly greater for strip tillage in two years and for no tillage in one year. The small increases in total seasonal water use (<10 mm) for strip tillage and no tillage correspond with greater grain yields for these tillage systems. Water productivity (grain yield/crop water use) also tended to be numerically greater (three of four years) for the strip tillage and no tillage treatments as compared to conventional tillage because of increased yields for the reduced tillage schemes. Increasing plant density from 66 300 to 82 300 plants/ha generally increased grain yield and water productivity (four-year average of approximately 6% for each factor). Results suggest that strip tillage obtains the residue benefits of no tillage in reducing evaporation losses without the yield penalty that sometimes occurs with large amounts of residue. Both strip tillage and no tillage should be considered as improved alternatives to conventional tillage, particularly when irrigation capacity is limited.
机译:玉米( Zea mays 。)自2004年至2007年在美国堪萨斯州科尔比市的深层,排水良好的粉壤土(Aridic Argiustolls)上生长,使用三种植物密度(66 300、74 500,或82,300株植物/公顷)在常规,条带或无耕种系统下的灌溉能力限制为每4、6、8天25毫米。在这四年不同的降水量和农作物蒸散量的影响下,玉米产量从最低灌溉能力到最大灌溉能力增加了约10%(1.43吨/公顷)。尽管在这四年中,耕作和不耕作的谷物单产都比常规耕作高(在四年平均水平上分别约为8.1%和6.4%(分别为1.11和0.88吨/公顷)),但只有两年,只有一年没有耕种。与常规耕作相比,带状耕作和不进行耕作的农作物季节性用水量往往更大,两年内带状耕作和一年不耕作的农作物季节性用水量显着增加。条状耕作的季节性总用水量略有增加(<10毫米),而无耕作则对应于这些耕作系统的更高谷物产量。与传统耕作相比,带状耕作的水生产率(谷物产量/作物用水量)在数值上也趋向于更高(三年),因为减少耕作方案的产量增加。种植密度从每公顷66300株增加到82300株,通常可提高谷物产量和水分生产率(每项因子的四年平均水平约为6%)。结果表明,带状耕作在减少蒸发损失方面获得了免耕的残渣优势,而不会因大量残渣而导致产量下降。条状耕作和不耕作均应视为传统耕作的改良替代品,尤其是在灌溉能力有限的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号