首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL YIELD VARIABILITY USING A COMBINED CROP MODEL-EMPIRICAL APPROACH
【24h】

ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL YIELD VARIABILITY USING A COMBINED CROP MODEL-EMPIRICAL APPROACH

机译:联合作物模型-经验方法分析空间屈服变异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The introduction of yield monitors, global positioning systems, and geographic information systems have provided new means to measure crop yield within a field, allowing very fine description of the spatial variability. However, only limited progress has been made on diagnosing reasons for yield variability and on identifying and managing areas of the field to maximize profit or reduce environmental impacts. Methods are needed to determine causes of yield variability and simulate spatial variability of yield across fields. The objective of this article was to quantify the effects of three yield-limiting factors (water stress, soybean cyst nematodes [SCN], and weeds) on soybean yield in a spatially variable field using a combined crop model-regression approach. The procedure was tested on 77 grid cells (0.2 ha) in the McGarvey field in Perry, Iowa, for 1995, 1997, and 1999. After estimating soil water and site parameters, predicted soybean yields were in good agreement with measured yield (r{sup}2 = 0.88). The root mean square of error (RMSE) was 243 kg ha{sup}(-1), within 11% of mean actual yield for each year. The combined model was then used to simulate the effect of each factor separately on yield loss for each grid cell. Water stress had the biggest impact on soybean yield among the yield-limiting factors for all years. Soybean yields were reduced by an average of 1391 kg ha{sup}(-1) as a result of water stress in 1997, while average yield reductions due to weeds and SCN were 167 and 109 kg ha{sup}(-1), respectively. Average estimated yield loss in 1997 due to the combined effects of water stress, SCN, and weeds in each grid cell was 1667 kg ha{sup}(-1). The regression coefficients for attributing yield losses to site factors were field-specific and may not be transferable to other fields and years, but they can be computed for fields where spatial layers include data on these factors.
机译:产量监控器,全球定位系统和地理信息系统的引入提供了一种新的手段来测量田间作物的产量,从而可以很好地描述空间变异性。但是,在诊断产量变化的原因以及确定和管理油田区域以最大化利润或减少环境影响方面,仅取得了有限的进展。需要方法来确定产量可变性的原因并模拟田间产量的空间可变性。本文的目的是使用组合作物模型回归方法,在空间可变的田间,量化三个产量限制因素(水分胁迫,大豆孢囊线虫[SCN]和杂草)对大豆产量的影响。在1995、1997和1999年,在爱荷华州佩里的McGarvey田地的77个网格单元(0.2公顷)上对该程序进行了测试。估算土壤水分和站点参数后,预测的大豆单产与测得的单产(r { sup} 2 = 0.88)。均方根误差(RMSE)为243 kg ha {sup}(-1),在每年平均实际产量的11%以内。然后使用组合模型分别模拟每个因素对每个网格单元的产量损失的影响。多年来,水分胁迫对大豆产量的影响最大。由于水分胁迫,1997年大豆平均减产1391 kg ha {sup}(-1),而杂草和SCN造成的平均减产分别为167和109 kg ha {sup}(-1),分别。由于每个网格单元中水分胁迫,SCN和杂草的综合影响,1997年的平均估计产量损失为1667 kg ha {sup}(-1)。将产量损失归因于场地因素的回归系数是特定于字段的,可能无法转移到其他字段和年份,但是可以为空间层包含有关这些因素的数据的字段计算回归系数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号